Recent content by AudioBob1
  1. AudioBob1

    320 kbps MP3 vs. normal audio CD listening Sound quality

    You will have read through the posts.  
  2. AudioBob1

    320 kbps MP3 vs. normal audio CD listening Sound quality

    You are still rambling on.
  3. AudioBob1

    320 kbps MP3 vs. normal audio CD listening Sound quality

    You could be a comedian man.   That is funny.
  4. AudioBob1

    320 kbps MP3 vs. normal audio CD listening Sound quality

    You are beating a dead horse.   I already addressed this yet you continue to ramble on.
  5. AudioBob1

    320 kbps MP3 vs. normal audio CD listening Sound quality

    You are a little late to the party, already addressed this.  Its like you glossed over these things in attempt to find one thing where you could look right. I get it.
  6. AudioBob1

    320 kbps MP3 vs. normal audio CD listening Sound quality

    If the lossless can't be undone then its not Lossless its lossy.   No I think you and the rest were getting confused mixing up terms.   Very common, don't worry about it.
  7. AudioBob1

    320 kbps MP3 vs. normal audio CD listening Sound quality

    We are talking about two different things here.  Audio signal compression and zip compression.   I am talking about Lossless in which you loose no information.   In zip files are you not loosing any information like you would with a jpeg file.   As long as the file is properly decompressed...
  8. AudioBob1

    320 kbps MP3 vs. normal audio CD listening Sound quality

    It can't be compressed if its a LOSSLESS Flac.      You can take a 128mp3 and turn it in to a Flac, that would be flac compressed.    So flacs can be lossy in that case.   But if you use a LOSSLESS Flac there will be ZERO difference.    Look up the word Lossless before you reply.
  9. AudioBob1

    320 kbps MP3 vs. normal audio CD listening Sound quality

    A flac compared to 128MP3 people can tell.   A Flac/wave compared to a 320MP3 is much more difficult,  its not a WOW there is a huge difference type of experience.  If playing on full range speakers and you have 20 year old hearing then why not using a wave or flac as the source?   320mp3 is...
  10. AudioBob1

    320 kbps MP3 vs. normal audio CD listening Sound quality

    It is NOT "Compressed" it is the same independent of how the wave was made.   
  11. AudioBob1

    320 kbps MP3 vs. normal audio CD listening Sound quality

    You have just admitted that you are deluded then.   It would be like saying When I play two identical wave files I can easily tell the difference in listening tests.   Its that insane.
  12. AudioBob1

    320 kbps MP3 vs. normal audio CD listening Sound quality

    Well BLue records are selling snake oil.    Flac = Wave.    I believe you could compress a flac but then it would not be a lossless flac.    The flac is the same as the source file.   If its wave it will be = to the wave.  Same information nothing is different but the extender.    Flac is the...
  13. AudioBob1

    320 kbps MP3 vs. normal audio CD listening Sound quality

    WindowsX is either a fruitcake or imagines things.   A flac and wave are the same in quality both lossless both the same as a CD.    If you thought they sounded different it was all in your head.   A flac made from a CD is the same as the wave except it has extra features in the metadata that...
Back
Top