224342's latest activity
-
Are you referring to certain competing website that focuses almost entirely on SINAD? :k701smile: -
I've enjoyed these a lot and they're built like tanks :D Agreed, that's a very healthy advice. Music in reviews is an interesting...
-
find a few who mirror your intent/direction.. eg if you are only interested in gaming positional accuracy, and don’t listen to jazz; an...
-
The above review is mlre fun The review template is more fun if you replace [FOTM] with certain body part :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
-
Brilliant!
-
Time to put up my favorite review template again - enjoy: The [FOTM] seems to be a very well balanced [FOTM] in every aspect of its...
-
Pro Tip: In a typical Head-Fi review, the Pros are gushy. The Cons are where I look first. And if the incredibly amazing gizmo of the...
-
Everything I owned (but no longer own) are pieces of crap and gutter-fi. /s
-
Flowery content is OK if applied carefully, but it's cool if after reading a review I have some understanding how a product reviewed may...
-
I'm fine with flowery to some degree, but not to the point where it's nonsensical. We are essentially dealing with auditory perception...
-
So I like to look up reviewers based on gear I enjoy or don’t like. If I find a reviewer that tends to have similar taste as I do (for...
-
224342 replied to the thread Common BS from audio companies?.Fair point
-
I am one of the others that disagree. While flowery language can be overdone I think it is difficult to hit the sweet spot between too...
-
224342 replied to the thread Common BS from audio companies?.I'll bear that in mind
-
Indeed.
