RockStar2005
Headphoneus Supremus
These are the features HTC claims they have. Is this for real? How does this compare with the Xiaomi Piston 3?
Specifications:
Features:
- Driver Unit: 13mm, Dynamic
- Diaphragm: PEEK
- Frequency Response: 10-40kHz
- Sensitivity: 106 dB/mW
- Impedance: 35Ω (at 1kHz)
- Cord Type: OFC, Y-type
- Power Handing Capacity: 100 mW
- Hi-Res audio certified
- Large 13mm dynamic driver for stronger bass and richer treble
- Aerospace-grade ultra thin (8μm) PEEK diaphragm delivers more powerful sound
- Ergonomically designed to fit your ear comfortably
- Double the sound range (10Hz-40kHz)
I don't understand much about these specs but I believe that what makes HTC claim they are Hi Resolution is the frequency response range (10Hz-40kHz) since the Xiaomi Piston 3 claim to have only from
20-20,000 Hz http://www.mi.com/en/headphones3/#param
Being "Hi-Res Certified" really doesn't mean all that much. As Voxie said, some of the best headphones don't even have that sticker, yet are still very highly-rated. What matters more is quality of parts, how everything is put together or implemented, how it's tuned/EQ'd, etc. I purchase Hi-Res recordings often, and I can tell you I don't do so b/c they're higher resolution. ANYTHING above mp3 (even lossy 256kbps+ AAC) will sound better (and IMO, 256kbps+ AAC will sound THE SAME as some huge Hi-Res 24/96 or 24/192 or even DSD file as long as they are from the SAME master). I do so b/c in my experience, studios reserve the BEST sounding masters for Hi-Res releases. I usually can hear a difference b/t it and the mp3 version of a song or album I have, and even still a CD I have too. CDs get "really good" masters and mp3s generally get the WORST sounding masters for their releases. It is what it is. And it's easier to market "numbers" than explanations like this one. lol (look honey, it has a higher resolution, so it must be better, right?! lol)
Last edited: