I prefers my Denon D600 to the HD800 but that's because the HD800 where too sterile! If the D7100 are not worth it over the D600 I'll prob def go M100 again.

Makes perfect sense, the D7100 is more luxurious I.e wood cups etc and cost more. I want to get one more so if I end up getting the D7100 I'll use my D600 as my portable. If they sound too alike to the point they literally can't be told apart then I'll buy the M100 again.

In the UK the D7100 are the same price as the Alpha Dog or AKG K712. My options are buy the D7100 and use my D600 for portable use or buy the M100 again for portability(instead of the D7100) If the D600 and D7100 are too similar then I may reconsider.

You don't actually believe they are worth the money?

First I just wanted the best equipment possible. After a while it turned out to be a drag and stressful constantly looking for upgrades even when I just bought new phones. I'm a closed back guy so went the route to purchase my first Hifi closed backs the Mad Dogs. After getting better equipment...

There really isn't much of a difference in detail. If anything I find the 598 to be a bit better in this department with it's bit larger soundstage abd better accuracy. The HD600 is alright but it's overpriced. I'd go with the 598 it's half the price has the same amount of detail, if not more...

completely wrong headphones for you IMO look into something with more attack and energy like the Grado SR60i with G cush.

Nope they are not defective I've had a few pairs and this is the sound. They are a more laid back sound. I prefer my Denons, I find them a bit cleaner sounding too but they both are for different useses.

I found the 880's ok. They still sound more on the sterile side to me though. I preferred the MA900 to them too. The MA900 are more open with a more fun liquid mid range and fuller bass imo

Nope I have many amps I really do find them slow. They are really great though but wished they had a more liquid mid range and speed but I appreciate them for what they are.

Why would anyone take advise from people on this forum about beats? They bash the product endlessly! And will assume that because some beats where bad they all are. Luckily I use my ears to determine what a headphone sounds like and I stand by what I say. I also will never say anything about a...

What can of drink is that? really curious lol

I don't think hardly any high end headphone is worth the price tag to be honest. There are a few exceptions like the Sony MA900 which I picked up for £80.   The Studio 2013 are £250-£270 it's  expensive but it's no more overpriced than say the V-Moda M100 and Momentum. They certainly sound...

Even if they are technically better they are still boring. My Q701 are better than my DT770 yet I'd pick my DT770 anyday because they simply are more musical and fun The HD600 are duller than a doornail and I got so fed up listening to such a boring sound that I ended up hating them. Saying...

I own the D600. They sound similar to my old D2000 with a bit more forward mids. The Pros of the D600 Musical Detailed Soundstage Bass Solid build Nice design and good cable's Cons Can be a bit sharp at times I really like them and I recommend them a lot.

But the HD600 are boring. And no the M50 doesn't sound as good as the Studio.

It's up to you really, they are a bit different in signature the Mid range is more pronounced on the MD while the M100 has more of a fuzzy mid range and lacks in detail quite a lot. I find the Mad dog very good but it's a very mellow slow sounding phone so it can sound quite boring if you listen...

This is what I believe music is all about. Sitting their picking out every little note and instrument is just so dull to me. Music wa made to be enjoyed, when I was young I remember massive parties with fun 90's music like this http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WJTwgMTI704 For me this hobby...

I never said that YOU mentioned about the Muddy-ness I was just poking a little fun at the people who use this to bash the product. I appreciate you taking the time to actually provide a decent argument, but what you said in bold about the thing being not a necessity we could probably say that...

I liked the NC it's not quite Bose level but it's a lot better than some. I just wished he build was better! all the good looking headphones apart form the D600 I've tired all have build issues, M100 is one I was gutted about as I loved the look but the cracking wing plates and cups was annoying.

The best you can come up with is "have a got source for this" Dude go try them, or a little easier go and research. That comment was just as petty as some of the bashing remarks in this thread.   Hey RoMee do you have a Source for everything you are saying? lol wind your neck in fella, it's...

But you can't have the same thing for less, do you not pay attention? The Studio has wayyyy more features than the UE6000 SQ is the same level but you are not just paying for SQ with the beats it's also the control features and extended battery life too, is it worth it? to some yes.   I'd...

Yes very silly...We have a thread full of stuck up wannabe "audiophiles" that think they are superior because they have a brand of headphone that isn't mainstream and feel the need to bash the most well known headphone brand on the planet by the masses that may not be the most accurate but they...

They both actually are the same tier of headphones SQ wise. The Beats Studio 2013 are a bit more Portable then these, have more unique features too.   Next ;)

I'm still waiting on this magical "Do better at the price range" So again, tell me a headphone that has the same or better features as the Studio 2013 that has the fun, clean musical sound and portablity?