Great controlled bass and fine tuned mids/highs in the new 3.0 pistons. Dinamic sound with punchi and a bit refined signature. I have bot 2.1 and 3.0- Both great deals. 2.0 Definitive more basshead     the Mic and control remote works flawless with lumia 620. PIston 2.1 and 3.0 as well.  

damn, i have a l70 (4g version) and dont work with my 2.x piston. Only you can hear then.

IS the remote control compatible with the lg and alcatel phones?

IS the remote compatible with the lg and alcatel phones?

  ok thanks!

  not because if dolby/dts use 24 bits, is for something   simple question: can you differentiate mp3 vbr/320 from a flac?

dolby true hd = 5.1 flac? is a lossless codec?   Quote:   ok but can 24 bits sound WORSE that 16 bits? because dolby/dts HD are recorded in 48khz/24 bits.

  SOUNDBLASTER Z. Decoder software by windDVD PRO. Conected to z906 logitech by analog 3.5mm cables.

  somebody? :(

  ok, marketing. I see.   But if i have a z906 (logitech) that dont have decoder for DD/DTS HD and play a movie with that codec audio... the system sound exactly that if i have conected the analog imputs and decoding with software?

    summarizing: 16 bits and 48 khz is the perfect combination for music but...     why we found that dts and dolby HD formats uses 24 bits (even at 48 khz) ??

  and what about 44.1 vs 96 khz?   i found that 48 is a best sound (dolby/dts) but is there sometihng better with 96 khz (again, talking abount native recorded, not mastering upsampling)

is there some material of popular music recently released in 24 native? ( i mean recorded several years ago, not a remasterized part of "dark side of the moon")     anyway... what are the benefits of 24 bits in recording and playback as welll?

  dolby digital is 16/48. What would be the difference with dolby hd?

  balanced cables (with o/i devices) make a diference, it is a fact.   The "hd" or "hi-res" format has more bit and khz, it is a fact.   money always exist, but in this case would have to look beyond. Behind the marketing can be something true and concrete       Quote:   yep but...

  balanced cables (with o/i devices) make a diference, it is a fact.   The "hd" or "hi-res" format has more bit and khz, it is a fact.   money always exist, but in this case would have to look beyond. Behind the marketing can be something true and concrete       Quote:   yep but...

  yep but with something technicaly true inside   THE point is, digitally speaking the format of 48/24 or greater is better than what we had 20 or 30 years ago when the cd was invented. Now, we are sufficiently audiophile / demanding in terms of audio to tell the difference?

placebo or deafness, that is the question... (willy say)     but again, if anything more that 44.1/16 is bullshet then why exist dolby trueHD, dta MA and thats stuffs..

  link please. Tell me: is there any difrence audible between flac and mp3 320?     why dts hd and dolby truehd  (formats of 24 bits/48-96 khz) exist if they dont sound better that a cd track? 

  that blind tests used native recorded 16 bits audio with a upsampling of 24       dts hd ma and dolby trueHD are smoke too?

  I saying that, no aes.   Aes failed in the comparation of sacd vs dvd audio and cd quality because they use a original 44.1/16 master piece.   so AES begins to understand that audio hd is inminent like a stardard, at last in 48/24 format.

    more that 16 bits = 24   the point is that if u record in 24 bits native and playback in a good system (JBL Es 30 or above. KRK 6 G3 or above) will sound more fidelic and life-like

    i was asistant in the aes surround seminar in buenos aires, argentina.   aes suport the hd audio   http://www.realhd-audio.com/?p=3405   even they tested the 24/96 vs 16/44.1 saying that was no diference. But after admits that the el original master audio was recording on 16/44.1 and...

I listen and the point is that music recorded in 24bits sounds better that 16. And so better if its recorded in 48 khz (dvd quality)   If u upsampling music recorded in 16 bits to 24 they dont sounds better (maybe worse)

hello, i want to buy the xperia e3 and dont have the apt-x... is realy recomended for a lg tone+/sony sbh80 in terms of quality audio?