Reviews by Dorstlesser

Dorstlesser

New Head-Fier
Pros: Comfortable
Cons: Treble, taken my ears, taken my thoughts, absolute horror!
Motivation for purchase
At work I'm moving from my own office to a space I share with colleagues. I love my Grado SR60e's but they are very leaky so I was looking for a closed pair of cans. I was undecided between the Audio Technica M50x and the AKG K181 DJ UE. The AT got better reviews but was also €50,- more expensive. So, I ordered them both to compare.

Gear
I'm using them in combination with an Audioquest Dragonfly Black 1.5, Audioengine N22 desktop amp and I'm playing MP3s and FLACs through Foobar.

Build and comfort
They seem solidly built and fit very comfortably over my ears. I have a fairly large head (not huge) and fairly small ears.

Sound
What immediately struck me about the sound was how much treble there was. It is seriously uncomfortable how much (high) treble there is compared to the rest of the spectrum. Maybe this can be solved with equalization but simply crushing the treble (which I tried) did not make them sound much better; because other holes in the spectrum quickly became apparent. The bass is lacking across the board; there's a bump somewhere in there but there's no subbass and the higher end of the bass/lower mids is not smooth at all and sounds very hollow or just absent. I tried them with all sorts of hiphop, rock, techno, folk, pop, classical, jazz you name it but the treble was just completely overpowering everything else. I switched cables to see if that was the problem, but no.

Compared to the Grado SR60e
Even though the Grado is less than half the price, the AT can't hold a candle to it. Not even remotely. The open Grado's even have more bass across the entire range, smoothly rolling into the mids which are super fluid. If anything, these M50x's have shown me just how damn good those Grado's sound. Of course the Grado's aren't nearly as comfy and they are super leaky.

Compared to the AKG K181 DJ UE
When turning on the 'bass boost' (which is just the opening of a vent, mind you), the K181s have the pumping bass they are apparently known for. Without the bass boost on, there isn't much; less than the Grado's in any case. The mids seem more fluid than on the M50x, although they don't come close to the Grado's. The treble is much more comfortable, so even though the K181's are not nearly as comfortable to wear as the M50x's, I'm sticking with the K181's as my closed cans. They look better too.

[edit] typo

[edit] So, were'e more than 2 years later and I've had the opportunity to compare my experience with the M50x to another pair of M50x which a friend of mine swears by. Several people here said they believed I might have purchased a defective or counterfeit pair and I can now counter that with some certainy. The other ones I've tried sound the same as the pair I wrote the above review about; harsh treble and disappointing bass. I will say again that the disappointing bass is less of an issue than the harsh treble, for me personally. To my ears, the treble is so bad they are actually unpleasant to listen to. Blame it on my ears, but I can't change how it sounds to me. I've been using the cheaper AKG 181 DJ UE daily with the infamous bass boost turned on and those put a smile on my face every single time. So, this illustrates how widely different people's ears are! I'm honestly surprised by this since of course I'm willing to believe the people who enjoy these cans (including my friend who loves his M50x); that just means there's big differences in the way some of us perceive sound!
cpauya
cpauya
Sorry, just re-read your post and verified that you're using some amps already. :)
Music Alchemist
Music Alchemist
@cpauya I wouldn't be surprised if it's the DACs that make many headphones sound harsher. I know Chord DACs are less harsh than many others. And my computer's onboard DAC is less harsh than at least one DAC I've had.
Redcarmoose
Redcarmoose
Reviews try to be complete and fair but in the end many become only half correct. It's the fact that we are all talking about such small aspects of the sound signature and everyone is coming from their own listening history. Once you read the graphs and take the personal perspectives into account then a pretty good understanding of a heaphones sound signature can be surmised here from reading.

Of course adding a $500 Mojo DAC could help the treble because Mojo has a warm and detailed signature. The cool part is the $122.00 M50s can scale to a better place with the Mojo.

Of course I understand the difference between bass detail and bass extension. In fact the M50s are bass heavy and offer a V curve though don't go as low as some bass heavy headphones. Also I seem to hear an area of bass detail in the lower area of the response which seems to have very little detail. It's just a thump and does not show the nuances in that area like some headphones do. The article should be understood as to the writers preference in the end and in relation to the other headphones in his possession. Both he and I are saying the same thing in our reviews. It's just that the M50s have their place today just as much as they always did. They are not a flat headphone but for the money they offer members a closed back headphone which comes off as fun, which does a service to what's in front of it.

They are good for people who need the benifit of a closed back headphone while on the subway and need the robust fold ability and build quality. They maybe get a little heck due to how often they are recommended here. That's OK and reviews like this show that they truly are not the end-all purchase at their price point. They still offer a value but have their own character and areas of plus and minus.
Back
Top