What should I buy next? SR-009?
Jun 3, 2013 at 7:58 PM Post #271 of 274
Has anyone here who has an SR-007 or SR-009 paired with a great amp also listened to the Orpheus (HE-90) system? How does the SR-009 compare to the Orpheus? From the little I've been able to gather from a few people, it seems that the SR-009 might be considered more "analytical" and the HE-90 more "musical" (among other things of course).
 
Dec 28, 2013 at 9:55 PM Post #272 of 274
I have 30 years experience in high end audio.  When I first wrote this I should have made it clearer that the 30 years is as a member of the industry.   I go to several shows per year including international.  Speakers are a huge interest of mine so I seek out and listen to every raved speaker, and walk the halls checking out every potentially great speaker that I hear any promise from.  I've picked my favorites to own.  Yet my first foray into headphones (Stax) has shown me that all speakers I have heard are more flawed than the headphones.  That is a strong statement, but it is not born of bias when you consider that I own hudreds of thousands of dollars worth of speakers and yet still make the preceeding statements.  

So, it comes down to, for me, more the pleasure factor of listening to headphones versus that of listening to speakers.  For some reason it was very easy for me to adapt and I seem to get as much pleasure from the headphones, but I hear more information in a more coherent manner.  Many questions about the scoring, particular instrumental sounds, the lowest level details that I struggled with before have been answered with the headphones.

For sonic quality, low distortion, the ultimate detail, in my opinion the headphones are far more sound per dollar than speakers. 

Nobody can argue about personal preference, so if you are more comfortable listening to speakers, if the sound of an energized room is more "real" to you, if you love sharing with friends, if the "feeling" of bass over your whole body is a huge advantage, so be it: you may get more pleasure out of a speaker.  But on a pure distortion, ultimate detail, seamless coherency basis I don't think a speaker is made that can equal the best headphones - except for the factors that can only be given by a set of speakers, that of being surrounded by sound, feeling the sound especially the bass, and "looking" at the soundstage in front of you in the room. 

A strange thing is that my headphones cause me to enjoy my speakers more than I did before.  It seems that having a transducer that delivers such extreme detail and coherency makes me accept the limitations of speakers, while also appreciating their visceral aspects that headphones cannot deliver.  

For me, an "either/or" decision or piece of advice would be very difficult.  I think "both" is  the best situation: a great set of headpones and a great pair of speakers.  


If it is not too much to ask I am in the process of funding a home theater system. I am getting a marantz receiver, Martin Logan motion 40's as well as a finishing center and a 5.1 to start that I will grow to 9.1 when I can fully afford it. However I am completely new to "high end" speakers and have only tried a handful such as Polk, definitive technology, Martin Logan, kef, klipsh, and svs. I thoroughly enjoy the Martin Logan's and as for now they are my ideal signature but I am looking for an adequate subwoofer. The one I like the best so far is the svs pb13 ultra for 2000. Keeping at the 2000 dollar mark do you have any suggestions for a sub that extends very low and is tight as well as being more musically oriented rather than for movies?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top