x RELIC x
Headphoneus Supremus
The million dollar question in a headphone forum... What's Rob's favourite headphone?
The million dollar question in a headphone forum... What's Rob's favourite headphone?
Hello Rob, just wondering if you think each and every dac that is the same model that are mass produced have equal and identical sound quality? - in particular with dacs that you manufacture. In the past I've had the exact same dac that have been mass produced and although exact same model, they sounded different all three times.(not Chord but diff. company) The difference was there with the same model made from the same company for me to label it an average dac into an audiophille dac. The 2-5 percent improvement was there between the 3 same dacs which surprised me. I am not sure if the issue was with burn-in but clearly there was enough difference in air and extension between the 3 of the same model and I am sure it wasn't placebo either.
Speaking personally - my current favourite is the AQ Nighthawks.
Now they are not to every ones taste - a lot of guys at Chord find them way too dark and smooth - but I like them because I can play for 12 hours and am still hungry for more music. By comparison, to me, other HP sound distorted. Moreover, they sound like loudspeakers in terms of tonal balance, and I mostly listen to loudspeakers.
Do they have faults - yes, they could be more transparent, and the bass is maybe softer than I would like - but they do so many things right.
I have been very impressed with Mr. Speakers Ether too - and have a pair of Ether C (HP is mostly in aircraft for me) coming.
Rob
Difficulties in listening
Placebo - convince yourself that your system sounds a lot better - and invariably it will. So your frame of mind is very important, so it's essential that when doing listening tests you are a neutral observer, with no expectations. This is not as easy as it sounds, but practice and forcing your mental and emotional state to be neutral helps.
I'm sure Rob will be kind enough to answer any mojo Hugo or dave questions but I would suggest it might be best if we can keep product specific discussion to their respective threads, and keep this on a more general discussion focused on Rob's blog entries.
We all know how fast the Hugo/Mojo threads go with the daily bombardment of product questions and not sure if we want to turn this into another helpdesk....
Cheers
Wouldn't looking over measurements invariably convince you that the product "sounds like the measurements", however you interpret the measurements to be? For example, you mentioned small signal non-linearity causes a number of issues in the listening tests. If someone else believed that a different factor causes these issues, and he sees this different "problem", won't he be convincing himself during the listening tests that the SQ has these issues, while he may be totally off in interpreting the measurements?
Because of this, I think the best way to do listening tests is before the measurements (for those good people that have the equipment to do them), so your ear doesn't know what to "expect".
I also met a few reviewers that don't believe in differences in soundstage. As a AKG K7xx/702 fan, soundstage is my bread and butter, and from listening tests, I thought some DAC's soundstage were larger than others, or, more accurately, some were smaller than what I would expect.
As I'm painfully ignorant when it comes to measurements (I'm only 20, I haven't had time to become an engineer yet), are there measurements that an accurately gauge soundstage? Or is it something that can only be told by ear alone? I know a few people who believe the differences aren't there, possibly because they don't see any difference in measurements... which isn't something I'm too comfortable with. After all, musicality (which they might not believe in either) also doesn't seem to have a reliable measurement.
But instead of me guessing and speculating, which of the listening test point can be seen in graphs, and which should be left up to the ear? I'm especially interested in soundstage, but it's an important question regarding all of the listening points.
Wouldn't looking over measurements invariably convince you that the product "sounds like the measurements", however you interpret the measurements to be? For example, you mentioned small signal non-linearity causes a number of issues in the listening tests. If someone else believed that a different factor causes these issues, and he sees this different "problem", won't he be convincing himself during the listening tests that the SQ has these issues, while he may be totally off in interpreting the measurements?
Because of this, I think the best way to do listening tests is before the measurements (for those good people that have the equipment to do them), so your ear doesn't know what to "expect".