athenaesword
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2007
- Posts
- 707
- Likes
- 12
what makes you think i doubt your findings? on the contrary, i think it's great that people are looking for ways to improve on existing products. did marco mention anything about upcoming improvements? it would be a thrill to hear that improvements could be made based on enduser suggestions.
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkeny /img/forum/go_quote.gif Do you doubt my report? I presume they had a number of goals in mind & this wasn't one of them - maybe it wouldn't fit in with the product size they had planned? I have sent my results to Marco & he has acknowledged it. I'm hoping that it will improve the product - if he simply replaces the existing switching down-converters for lower noise ones it will help. A lot of people make the mistake that by providing a low jitter clock we get low jitter signals - in fact a really stable, dedicated low noise PS is also required for the clock. I can now finally hear what low jitter sounds like - good analogue Edit: Steve, you got there before me! PS I'll email you about clock! |