- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Posts
- 28,357
- Likes
- 32,210
For anyone who wonder the sound signature of this Grounded grid:
Soundstage: still ethereal like carbon , but with smoother and more fluidly mid together with sweet tonal body and energy delivery, the soundstage do appear to be deeper while the Carbon is more like all width and more fixated on positioning. The soundstage on GG is actually can be said to be flowing with the panning affects and so on you can actually let your mind be floated to the continuity and flow of the effects and feel like the music is streaming and flowing from far left to far right and approach from front and flowing toward into the back and so on. The SS Carbon actually have it too, but not as satisfying or pronounced. GG>Carbon
Bass: upper spectrum of the Sub bass section is actually very blooming, but in trade it doesn't dive as deep as the Carbon. Big body, warmth but not slow or loose, just blooming. Mid bass is powerful with beautiful energy variations, every body and energy of each lines are totally separated and carry it own density, this effects carry on all the way through to the mid high spectrum. Due to this, the bass seems more musical but less satisfying than carbon while carbon can be said to have both musicality and satisfaction, though if you are a tubes fan, you may think carbon bass is not realistic enough. I do think GG bass is better for ballads, rock, metal, instrumentals, country, pop....but not modern pop and or hip-hop or EDM. Carbon is more universal to all genres here. Carbon >> GG
Mid: very detailed but with meaty tonal body and timbres together with the fat energy and fluidity, it appears very smooth, very very sweet, warmth, totally tubes-like sound. The details of the mid spectrum is very magical, the upper minds are so smooth and full of energy that is why it is so detailed, and not being harsh at all, and because it carries into the mid high spectrum, the lower treble are so awesome, thick, vivid. Carbon mid is faster so it makes the soundstage to also be more width than depth, more fixated positioning than flowing like GG. GG>>Carbon
Treble: the lower and mid spectrum is smooth, thick and dense. It is vivid and organic. The upper extensions is not as tip top as the SS Carbon but because it thick and dense body stops before the tip-top of the extensions, the treble doesn't appear to be harsh or sibilant even when I turn up the current. The SS Carbon when running 17.5 mA, I can observe that it becomes too fast and lose the warmth and organic feeling, where as the GG even with 18 mA the bloom, the warmth, the smooth and detailed vivid trebles are still there, which makes me want to turn up the current even further. However, judging by the thick density and energetic of the treble body, I feel like 18mA is ok. I will need to do some tubes rolling to get what I want. Personal preferences (GG=Carbon, I guess)
Ultimately, are you a fan of SS or tubes ?
ATM, I am using re-issues Mullar el34: so soundstage is addictive, mid to high spectrums are thick and vividly smooth with details and magical tube tonal body. What I want more would be a bit more extensions to the trebles and deeper bass......
What poison am I getting into ? Tubes rolling can cost me a fortune. Anyone has expertise in tubes and it sound signature here ?
**updated**: I just cranked her up to 20mA. She definitely dive deeper with finer trebles lines but still doesn't get that Sub bass and bass lines as deep and as defined as Carbon. She distorts more at some complex passages, but not really bad. I will need to swap her tubes into 6Ca7 and see if it helps anything. I will set her in stones at this current setting, and just tube rolling
Soundstage: still ethereal like carbon , but with smoother and more fluidly mid together with sweet tonal body and energy delivery, the soundstage do appear to be deeper while the Carbon is more like all width and more fixated on positioning. The soundstage on GG is actually can be said to be flowing with the panning affects and so on you can actually let your mind be floated to the continuity and flow of the effects and feel like the music is streaming and flowing from far left to far right and approach from front and flowing toward into the back and so on. The SS Carbon actually have it too, but not as satisfying or pronounced. GG>Carbon
Bass: upper spectrum of the Sub bass section is actually very blooming, but in trade it doesn't dive as deep as the Carbon. Big body, warmth but not slow or loose, just blooming. Mid bass is powerful with beautiful energy variations, every body and energy of each lines are totally separated and carry it own density, this effects carry on all the way through to the mid high spectrum. Due to this, the bass seems more musical but less satisfying than carbon while carbon can be said to have both musicality and satisfaction, though if you are a tubes fan, you may think carbon bass is not realistic enough. I do think GG bass is better for ballads, rock, metal, instrumentals, country, pop....but not modern pop and or hip-hop or EDM. Carbon is more universal to all genres here. Carbon >> GG
Mid: very detailed but with meaty tonal body and timbres together with the fat energy and fluidity, it appears very smooth, very very sweet, warmth, totally tubes-like sound. The details of the mid spectrum is very magical, the upper minds are so smooth and full of energy that is why it is so detailed, and not being harsh at all, and because it carries into the mid high spectrum, the lower treble are so awesome, thick, vivid. Carbon mid is faster so it makes the soundstage to also be more width than depth, more fixated positioning than flowing like GG. GG>>Carbon
Treble: the lower and mid spectrum is smooth, thick and dense. It is vivid and organic. The upper extensions is not as tip top as the SS Carbon but because it thick and dense body stops before the tip-top of the extensions, the treble doesn't appear to be harsh or sibilant even when I turn up the current. The SS Carbon when running 17.5 mA, I can observe that it becomes too fast and lose the warmth and organic feeling, where as the GG even with 18 mA the bloom, the warmth, the smooth and detailed vivid trebles are still there, which makes me want to turn up the current even further. However, judging by the thick density and energetic of the treble body, I feel like 18mA is ok. I will need to do some tubes rolling to get what I want. Personal preferences (GG=Carbon, I guess)
Ultimately, are you a fan of SS or tubes ?
ATM, I am using re-issues Mullar el34: so soundstage is addictive, mid to high spectrums are thick and vividly smooth with details and magical tube tonal body. What I want more would be a bit more extensions to the trebles and deeper bass......
What poison am I getting into ? Tubes rolling can cost me a fortune. Anyone has expertise in tubes and it sound signature here ?
**updated**: I just cranked her up to 20mA. She definitely dive deeper with finer trebles lines but still doesn't get that Sub bass and bass lines as deep and as defined as Carbon. She distorts more at some complex passages, but not really bad. I will need to swap her tubes into 6Ca7 and see if it helps anything. I will set her in stones at this current setting, and just tube rolling