Jozurr
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2009
- Posts
- 2,920
- Likes
- 321
Please don't be encouraged by what I said. All of this is true only in relation to the SE-M1. As I said, it's all about subjective impressions and preferences. I still haven't made my mind up about the Z1R, so I have held back with impressions. But a user asked about this specific comparison (more specifically, about clarity and airiness), and I was able to compare as I happen to own both units, so I did. In fact, "boring" might have been the wrong choice of words. It's not boring per se, in fact I have described it as having a "fun" signature before. I think what's lacking to me has mostly to do with the slightly rolled-off highs. It's probably just that little bit of sparkle up top that's missing. Again, I'm not trying to diss the Z1R. It's a fine can, and I actually like it. It's just that I love the SE-M1. Also, it might be what I compare is just open vs. closed sound in general. Perhaps I like open headphones more than I realized before I acquired the Z1R. They just belong to different segments. Very different specimens.
One word on the Pioneer SE-Master1: To me, it does things that no other headphone does. It has the most "speaker-like" presentation that I ever heard emitted by a can. I'm in the lucky position that I have been able to listen to almost all of the current flagships, and the Pioneer, to me, is an absolute singularity. It really is your dark horse, and for me, personally, it's hands-down the best dynamic headphone there is. Its soundstage is vast, there's the most incredible amount of air between notes, and at the same time the bass can hit really hard. It has often been described as a crossbreed between the HD800 and the TH-900. As I said, I don't particularly care for either, but if you take only the best traits of both (i. e. the HD800's soundstage and the TH-900 "prodigious" capabilities in the bass section), you might have a rough approximation of what this headphone brings to the table. It's literally quite unheard of, I think, almost magic, lol. To be fair, I have heard of people that hate it, even if they mostly seemed to base their impressions on graphs alone.To my knowledge, no one could sufficiently explain what exactly it was they hated about it. It probably has to do with its singular sound, but the only thing I can imagine someone not liking is the huge soundstage that some, like with the HD800, could find "exaggerated". I could get that, even though I happen to adore it. There you go, maybe I just don't like headphones, lol.
That doesn't help much with this case. Makes me want to try the M-1 even more
One of the reasons I like the HE-6 (or a funktion one system) is because of the high energy ALONG with very good bass. I've also noticed you in the techno threads a lot, and I mostly listen to techno music, so I feel I can go with your judgement, which makes this all the more difficult to ignore the M-1 in favour of the Z1R. The problem is there's no way to try the M-1, and see if it's better than the HE-6 to begin with.
Also, I'd love to read the PM by up late for the summary of the things people didn't like about the M-1, if you can share. You can PM if you dont want to share here.
Regarding the Utopia Discusssion, flat or not and them being on the wall of fame etc, they just don't extend as low as the HE-6 and neither do they hit as hard. Someone who has heard good club systems like Funktion one or Void Acoustics would know the kind of sound I mean, and headphones wise, The HE-6 are the closest I've come to a big club system. With what you say @phonomat , I think M-1 would be worth a shot too.