- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Posts
- 28,359
- Likes
- 32,215
I saw someone mentioned the Z1R is not as great in trebles details as SA5000 ? Holy hell, I am glad to have an S5k
I saw someone mentioned the Z1R is not as great in trebles details as SA5000 ? Holy hell, I am glad to have an S5k
SA5000 is the treble master though.
Then it mother would be Qualia Q10. Honestly, why can't Sony bring the same technology back with 70mm and improved designs, housing and the materials ?
+1!! No Fibonacci, no honey
Lol....4K vs 2k ? Common...
Just spiking the crowd a bit. Carbon fiber vs Beta Titanium, lambskin with holes vs lambskin without holes, case with round corners vs case with pointy corners, this hype versus that hype, y'know how it goes, just to get the talk flowing and people going for their wallets.
You forgot "potentially poisonous Beryllium vs no potentially poisonous Beryllium".
A concern I have with the Z1R, and any headphone for that matter is what group of people are tuning it ultimately. I'm sure they are using CAD for a great deal of the tuning, but in the end it will be a select group of people who use their ears to approve and dial in the sound signature for production. If companies rely on the same small group for this decision they will likely end up with fairly similar tunings between models (unless they really go out of their comfort zones on purpose). It can almost be an audio version of group think.
I really did not think the Z7 signature was so good that it would be worthy as the inspiration for a flagship effort so I really hope Sony did not just get the same group of people to "retune" the Z7 with a bunch of new tech. I would hate to spend this kind of money on a headphone to end up with a tweaked and improved Z7 with more resolution, that would be a shame. Still, I'm hopeful that Sony actually produced a new signature as opposed to retooling the Z7.