Same experience.I found the sound of a18s is too thick and warm, and also less clarity and detail than u12t.
I won't order another ciem again…
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Official 64 Audio Thread | apex & tia Technologies
mcemce13
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2015
- Posts
- 170
- Likes
- 68
To me was the opposite. Sold my U18t right after purchasing the U18s. I guess I am treble sensitive and the 18s is the perfect balance for my ears, IMHO the best 64audio iem. Also tried the U12t but again, compared to the 18s was no doubt in my mind which one to keep. Its very personal, I guess you have to listen and decide for your self.Same experience.
Duo has LID we just put more of a spotlight on its all-pass filter and unique apex implementation.my mistake, I was so convinced that it was the 18s ... knew there 3 models missing LID, the third is Duo ..
Thank you for spotting it!
Stay updated on 64 Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Duo has LID we just put more of a spotlight on its all-pass filter and unique apex implementation.
Hi 64Audio,
I'm planning for obsolescence so Plan A is to wait for the next iteration of A18*.
But if plans change before the next iteration, am I immune from LID since my whole chain runs in mOhms since then I would only be interested in a LID-less A18t (Plan B)?
My connectors paired with Official Estron should run < .5 mOhm. My DAC is about .25 mOhm.
I like to have one foot in the door in the Mastering world and one foot in the door in the Audiophile world so my chain should reflect with the DAC, cable and transducers. The A18t should have nice synergy since it is flat sounding as possible and I can do <.5ohms. I already have a fully transparent chain with no sound signature all the way up to the transducer so instead of veering off course with a non-flat transducer, I like to stay flat sounding as possible.
EDIT: It can be difficult to distinguish mOhms from ohms. mOhms is way way super less than ohms (<.5ohms requirement). It's close to zero impedance which is my goal for my whole chain starting from my Super Capacitor power supplies which run 30 times lower than the Chord TT₂ supercap power supply. It's my "Ride Off into the Sunset" rig to complete my hobby ARC, so I like to cross every "t" and dot every "i".
Last edited:
Using a low impedance source would not make you "immune" to LID. It's really more the opposite. LID makes you immune to change in frequency response caused by high impedance sources. So if you are using an ultra low impedance chain then you would not notice any difference between an IEM with LID and one without LID (obviously apart from the inherent differences between our different models).Hi 64Audio,
I'm planning for obsolescence so Plan A is to wait for the next iteration of A18*.
But if plans change before the next iteration, am I immune from LID since my whole chain runs in mOhms since then I would only be interested in a LID-less A18t (Plan B)?
Stay updated on 64 Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Hi @64Audio , I just bought a used 64audio U6T, just realized that the termination is different. What is the original termination material ?
Attachments
The original termination looks like thisHi @64Audio , I just bought a used 64audio U6T, just realized that the termination is different. What is the original termination material ?
Attachments
Stay updated on 64 Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2013
- Posts
- 835
- Likes
- 3,558
That's weird, the termination looks like it is from the older premium cable which shipped with the older style packaging/accessories. But the rest of the cable looks the same as the current stock cable itself. I am also curious to see what 64Audio says.Hi @64Audio , I just bought a used 64audio U6T, just realized that the termination is different. What is the original termination material ?
As far as I know (or remember) our older cables that used the angled termination always had a black barrel. I believe that the previous owner of that U6t changed the termination, but I could be wrong.That's weird, the termination looks like it is from the older premium cable which shipped with the older style packaging/accessories. But the rest of the cable looks the same as the current stock cable itself. I am also curious to see what 64Audio says.
Stay updated on 64 Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2013
- Posts
- 835
- Likes
- 3,558
As far as I know (or remember) our older cables that used the angled termination always had a black barrel. I believe that the previous owner of that U6t changed the termination, but I could be wrong.
You are right, just went through my photos of the older version U18t I had here and this is the old cable:
So yeah the previous owner seems to have just modded the connector, not a nice thing to sell it without warning the buyer.
Using a low impedance source would not make you "immune" to LID. It's really more the opposite. LID makes you immune to change in frequency response caused by high impedance sources. So if you are using an ultra low impedance chain then you would not notice any difference between an IEM with LID and one without LID (obviously apart from the inherent differences between our different models).
Many thanks for letting me complete my Due Diligence.
I'm completely off my CIEM game since pre-COVID so LID is confusing AF. Apex should be a flatter learning curve.
The latter half of your comment was what I was initially intending to ask.
So now, I have a solid plan:
- Plan A. Wait for A18*.
- Plan B. Any significant downtime due to circumstances, A18t.
thanks, do you have any information on the material ? or what is the equivalence ? like oyaide straight gold or pentaconn ofc 3.5 mm ? I'm afraid that the sound that I get right now is not the same with what the engineers intended.The original termination looks like this
My Volür arrived today. Gorgeous IEM, but the treble spike is very real. Does anyone have any cable or tip suggestions for calming it down a bit, or a suggested EQ setting? Other than that I absolutely love them, but it has a bit of bite for sure.
Thanks
Thanks
From 64audio page, it was shipped with spinfit, probably CP 100 the same with U6T.My Volür arrived today. Gorgeous IEM, but the treble spike is very real. Does anyone have any cable or tip suggestions for calming it down a bit, or a suggested EQ setting? Other than that I absolutely love them, but it has a bit of bite for sure.
Thanks
You need to use that spinfit and gauge what do you want to reduce and how far
then check this url https://www.audioreviews.org/guide-to-iem-silicone-eartips/
CP100 has the following profile
Bass: 3.5
Midrange: 5
Treble: 4
Soundstage: 4
Vocal presence: 3.25
you just need to find eartips that is has the quality that you need, probably cp100+ (assuming it is the same with U6T)
o0genesis0o
Headphoneus Supremus
If you wear it deeper, the treble peak is likely pushed to the upper treble region where it belongs to.My Volür arrived today. Gorgeous IEM, but the treble spike is very real. Does anyone have any cable or tip suggestions for calming it down a bit, or a suggested EQ setting? Other than that I absolutely love them, but it has a bit of bite for sure.
Thanks
Personally, I swapped to the stock foam tips for and giggle with my U12t and ended up enjoying the sound. Smoother, more comfortable, thicker bass, without losing out on stage or resolution.
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 10 (members: 1, guests: 9)