emertxe
Aka: MHOE, MetalHOE
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2013
- Posts
- 328
- Likes
- 31
Emertxe, how would you rank all those mid-fi headphones (K712, HE-400, DT880, Q701, HD600, HD650) that you heard based on sound quality?
Wow, very good question, love it!
Basically, one must stress that audio and headphones especially are all very subjective... There is no best headphone. There are only headphones that YOU find better and therefore it's always good to state why. I would say that I rate neutrality very high, comfort follows and soundstaging is likely the third aspect I am looking for. I must also stress that I am not a basshead but still if I don't hear enough bass from headphones, they fail to impress me enough. It's not about hearing bass all the time - it's about hearing instruments and voices in a realistic way.
=======================================================================
Ok, if I do not take comfort into account, it would go like this:
1) AKG K712 Pro - if you have the money, skip everything else and go for these...
... add certain gap here...
2a) Beyedynamic DT880 - really neutral and good sounding headphones, except the artificial treble peak. If you are willing to EQ the 7-10khz down, these are definitely the second best recommendation. Their soundstage is not as good as with Q701 or K712 Pro though.
2b) Sennheiser HD600 - if you are not willing to EQ the DT880, I would most probably go for these. They are very natural sounding... Not the fastest, the most expansive or suited for detail-heads but natural. Their bass do not reach very low, you have to go for DT880 or K712 Pro if you want deep bass. But their very mild midbass emphasis and forgiving nature makes them good for almost every genre.
3) AKG Q701 - Their soundstage is great (really, in comparison to DT880 and HD600) but the overall sound signature lacks bass - that makes many instruments and vocals as well sound unnatural. Their 2khz also makes vocals sound shouty and a bit sibilant. They are a bit plasticky sounding, more so than DT880 or HD600. Still, in comparison to other headphones and considering their price, they are a quite good option.
... add certain gap here...
4) Audio Technica AD1000 and Shure 1840 - both offer good soundstaging and light and airy sound but seriously lack deeper bass to be called neutral. Both are also over-trebled (AD1000 more). My opinion? Definitely skip them, not worth the money. Q701 can be had cheaper and offer a similar sound signature and soundstaging. Though I haven't spent as much time with them as with the first 4 headphones in this list (which I liked the most).
5) Sennheiser HD598 (or modded HD558) - surprisingly versatile and almost neutral headphones - it's their strongest feature. Technically not on the level of headphones above but yeah, they are both very pleasing and I would gladly recommend them to anyone - very comfortable, versatile sound signature, quite good soundstage, low price...
... add certain gap here...
6) Sennheiser HD650 - I was told that there are many different-sounding HD650s but I don't really care. I listened to them on a fast and neutral amplifier (Concerto) but they were very slow and veiled and offered poor soundstaging. Very strong clamp was also an issue (sorry to mention but it was really a dealbreaker itself). Very midbassy and veiled sound... I cannot recommend this to anyone who wants to stay awake for more than 5 minutes (I was shocked that I actually started falling asleep with these headphones after a minute... I thought it's impossible when listening to music with headphones). I cannot understand how anyone could even think about comparing HD650 to LCD-2... It's a different galaxy or maybe even dimension
7) Audio-technica AD900 and Shure 1440 - superbright, very artificial-sounding, absolutely underwhelming and dont want me to talk more about them... Horrible headphones!
=======================================================================
I somewhere posted more in-depth notes I think... Will try to find them.
Oh - IMHO IMHO IMHO IMHO IMHO