Quote:
arguably the more drivers the less hard each driver must work to move the air sooooooooooo there should in theory be some improvement.
however i think its mostly to pander to "more = better"
that said i think somuthing like 5 driver could be interesting, do a normal 3 way like the the UM3x and use the other 2 as a 2 way with a seperate crossover so that they both smoothly cover the crosover points of the 3 way system.
Yeah, "more = better" is old-school marketing psychology ... and it
still seems to work. However, the comments posted in this (and similar) forums also indicate more-aware end-users (= geeks, audiophiles, etc). So the marketing psych might not always work (or even be counterproductive) ... nevertheless, it's still used . Is this because the primary customer the manuf caters to (= where the profits are) is not that critical about (interested in) the
technology itself (i.e., they only go by their ears) ??? Hence (warning: wild speculation ...), the more=better theory is placebo effect or cognitive dissonance or psychosomatic? Maybe, Tyll and InnerFidelity can be talked into another
double-blind test. LOL.
IAC...
Not sure what may be considered "hard work" at
this mass-driver scale. A v. crude analogy may be how much more mass a beetle can move compared to a human.
Perhaps the single most important technology that made high-performance IEMs/ear buds possible is the powerful neodymium (Nd) magnet. Using it, you can scale way down to the "micro" (in-ear) level (and/or use their powerful MGOe for necessary apps in computer HDs and hybrid car components ... or beyer Tesla full-sized cans.
Note: I realize that Nd is used quite ubiquitiously in the industry -- even for cheap cans. But like all things in the modern era, Nd mags have been steadily improving -- and there are better (= pricier) "grades" for more-critical apps). While modern Nd's can offer relatively high MGOe at small sizes, the size
still matters ... bigger=more powerful. This is why I earlier remarked about all the room taken up by the
separate housing elements of BA modules, as shown here...
The
metal chassis may also pick up EMF/RF and can itself induce EM distortion . Does an IEM designer want to fit a bunch of these into a space-limited chassis? Or simply settle with one or two well-designed units (BA or dynamic) with
large, high-MGOe Nd magnet(s)?
IEMs with several BA drivers -- as shown above -- may indeed sound better for reasons unrelated to the quantity used. The obvious -- quality -- is one. Some one mentioned tuning ... for sure: tweak the electronics math and play around with driver positions enough (i.e. invest time into the project) and read all our feedback (forums, blogs, review sites) and tweak/tune some more ... and bingo: "Man, that latest $2,000 8-way Ear-fi custom sounds awesome". "Get your own."