- Joined
- Mar 21, 2007
- Posts
- 2,431
- Likes
- 1,447
is there such a thing for headphones? i google'd and found little information but nothing concrete. how is the performance versus having the cable re-terminated to balanced?
single ended to balanced adapter?
- Thread starter SemiAudiophile
- Start date
Kees
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2006
- Posts
- 4,619
- Likes
- 26
Quote:
This has been asked (and answered) before.
There are no SE to balanced adapters because you cannot turn SE to balanced with an adapter. This is because in SE the ground wires are shared while in balanced mode they must be separate and are used for the inverted signal.
Some phones have four wires going into the (SE) plug, those can be reterminated by removing the plug and separating the ground wires.
| Originally Posted by SemiAudiophile /img/forum/go_quote.gif is there such a thing for headphones? i google'd and found little information but nothing concrete. how is the performance versus having the cable re-terminated to balanced? |
This has been asked (and answered) before.
There are no SE to balanced adapters because you cannot turn SE to balanced with an adapter. This is because in SE the ground wires are shared while in balanced mode they must be separate and are used for the inverted signal.
Some phones have four wires going into the (SE) plug, those can be reterminated by removing the plug and separating the ground wires.
Steve Eddy
Member of the Trade: The Audio Guild
Aka: TempAccount555
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
- Posts
- 6,609
- Likes
- 554
Quote:
Sure you can.
It's called a transformer.
k
| Originally Posted by Kees /img/forum/go_quote.gif This has been asked (and answered) before. There are no SE to balanced adapters because you cannot turn SE to balanced with an adapter. |
Sure you can.
It's called a transformer.
k
Punnisher
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2007
- Posts
- 2,655
- Likes
- 41
You can have a SE connector with balanced inputs attached. It will let you listen to your balanced phones on a SE amplifier. Though it won't be truly balanced by any means.
revolink24
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2008
- Posts
- 2,885
- Likes
- 51
Making a single ended headphone balanced with an adapter would just be turning the 1/4" plug into XLRs, not making them balanced.
Steve Eddy
Member of the Trade: The Audio Guild
Aka: TempAccount555
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
- Posts
- 6,609
- Likes
- 554
Quote:
Typical dynamic headphones are already inherently "balanced."
The only distinction is whether or not they're driven from a balanced or unbalanced source.
And an unbalanced source can be made into a balanced source using transformers.
k
| Originally Posted by revolink24 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Making a single ended headphone balanced with an adapter would just be turning the 1/4" plug into XLRs, not making them balanced. |
Typical dynamic headphones are already inherently "balanced."
The only distinction is whether or not they're driven from a balanced or unbalanced source.
And an unbalanced source can be made into a balanced source using transformers.
k
cerbie
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2005
- Posts
- 1,219
- Likes
- 12
Quote:
...and I'm sure that a transformerless SS balanced amplifier will just love having L- and R- shorted, right?
The best option for both would be to terminate the cable in a good 4-pin connector (4-pin mini-xlr, maybe?), and have adapters made. You can use a headphone that exposes L- and R- as an SE headphone just fine, with an adapter that shorts them again.
Quote:
No, they are not. Typical dynamic headphones share a common signal ground. Some happen to have a Y design in the cable, making things easier, but that still necessitates after-market modification of some kind, even if it's just a custom cable. For differential operation, each signal needs its own + and - (0' and 180') with matching impedance.
| Originally Posted by revolink24 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Making a single ended headphone balanced with an adapter would just be turning the 1/4" plug into XLRs, not making them balanced. |
...and I'm sure that a transformerless SS balanced amplifier will just love having L- and R- shorted, right?
The best option for both would be to terminate the cable in a good 4-pin connector (4-pin mini-xlr, maybe?), and have adapters made. You can use a headphone that exposes L- and R- as an SE headphone just fine, with an adapter that shorts them again.
Quote:
| Originally Posted by Koyaan I. Sqatsi Typical dynamic headphones are already inherently "balanced." |
No, they are not. Typical dynamic headphones share a common signal ground. Some happen to have a Y design in the cable, making things easier, but that still necessitates after-market modification of some kind, even if it's just a custom cable. For differential operation, each signal needs its own + and - (0' and 180') with matching impedance.
Steve Eddy
Member of the Trade: The Audio Guild
Aka: TempAccount555
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
- Posts
- 6,609
- Likes
- 554
Quote:
No, they don't.
They share a common node, but that node isn't inherently signal ground.
Certainly it will be if plugged into an unbalanced source. But if plugged into transformer coupled balanced outputs, it won't be.
There is no difference between A and B with regard to signal balance, either at the transformer end or the driver end.
Neither channel sees the other, there is no signal current that flows between channels, and the common node does nothing to unbalance either the transformer or the driver.
k
| Originally Posted by cerbie /img/forum/go_quote.gif No, they are not. Typical dynamic headphones share a common signal ground. |
No, they don't.
They share a common node, but that node isn't inherently signal ground.
Certainly it will be if plugged into an unbalanced source. But if plugged into transformer coupled balanced outputs, it won't be.
There is no difference between A and B with regard to signal balance, either at the transformer end or the driver end.
Neither channel sees the other, there is no signal current that flows between channels, and the common node does nothing to unbalance either the transformer or the driver.
k
cerbie
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2005
- Posts
- 1,219
- Likes
- 12
I see. If copper were cheaper, this stuff would be a lot easier, I guess.
Steve Eddy
Member of the Trade: The Audio Guild
Aka: TempAccount555
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
- Posts
- 6,609
- Likes
- 554
Quote:
Actually it's not the copper that costs so much as the nickel transformer laminations. And by a very wide margin. As my transformer manufacturer friend says, the copper's like a free gift for having bought the laminations.
But even then, a good pair of output transformers can be had for under $100.
k
| Originally Posted by cerbie /img/forum/go_quote.gif I see. If copper were cheaper, this stuff would be a lot easier, I guess. |
Actually it's not the copper that costs so much as the nickel transformer laminations. And by a very wide margin. As my transformer manufacturer friend says, the copper's like a free gift for having bought the laminations.
But even then, a good pair of output transformers can be had for under $100.
k
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2007
- Posts
- 2,431
- Likes
- 1,447
what about the other way around? balanced to single-ended adapter? IIRC, another member on this forum had one.
ClaudeRaines
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2009
- Posts
- 31
- Likes
- 10
Steve Eddy
Member of the Trade: The Audio Guild
Aka: TempAccount555
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
- Posts
- 6,609
- Likes
- 554
Quote:
The beautiful thing about transformers is you can have your cake and eat it too. You can have balanced output and keep your TRS plug. No having to dangle a couple of big goat testicles off your headphone cable. With the adapter, you've now got four big goat testicles dangling off your headphone cable.
k
| Originally Posted by SemiAudiophile /img/forum/go_quote.gif what about the other way around? balanced to single-ended adapter? IIRC, another member on this forum had one. |
The beautiful thing about transformers is you can have your cake and eat it too. You can have balanced output and keep your TRS plug. No having to dangle a couple of big goat testicles off your headphone cable. With the adapter, you've now got four big goat testicles dangling off your headphone cable.
k
cerbie
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2005
- Posts
- 1,219
- Likes
- 12
Quote:
Huh. Still, $100 is quite the cost, when new plugs are only a few bucks, each. OTOH, the retail prices of recabling...ouch.
| Originally Posted by Koyaan I. Sqatsi /img/forum/go_quote.gif Actually it's not the copper that costs so much as the nickel transformer laminations. And by a very wide margin. As my transformer manufacturer friend says, the copper's like a free gift for having bought the laminations.
But even then, a good pair of output transformers can be had for under $100. k |
Huh. Still, $100 is quite the cost, when new plugs are only a few bucks, each. OTOH, the retail prices of recabling...ouch.
Steve Eddy
Member of the Trade: The Audio Guild
Aka: TempAccount555
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
- Posts
- 6,609
- Likes
- 554
Quote:
No, it's not exactly cheap. But then that's for a pair of premium quality transformers on substantial 80% nickel cores. You can also get a pair on similarly sized M6 (grain oriented silicon steel) cores from Edcor for about $25. And if you REALLY want to go cheap, you can get a pair on even smaller M6 cores for about $15.
Quote:
Yes, there is that.
Anyway, just pointing out that there are other options.
k
| Originally Posted by cerbie /img/forum/go_quote.gif Huh. Still, $100 is quite the cost... |
No, it's not exactly cheap. But then that's for a pair of premium quality transformers on substantial 80% nickel cores. You can also get a pair on similarly sized M6 (grain oriented silicon steel) cores from Edcor for about $25. And if you REALLY want to go cheap, you can get a pair on even smaller M6 cores for about $15.
Quote:
| ...when new plugs are only a few bucks, each. OTOH, the retail prices of recabling...ouch. |
Yes, there is that.
Anyway, just pointing out that there are other options.
k
Users who are viewing this thread
