ashjamben
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 21, 2008
- Posts
- 7
- Likes
- 0
so what do you guys think? i sent in a broken pair of E2c's in and they sent me a pair of SE110's. At first i figured they must be the 'newer' version of the E2c's, so cracked them open and tried them out. After further research i found that the SCL2's are in fact the 'newer' version of the E2c's and, in my opinion, they should have sent me a pair of those instead. the specs of the SCL's and E2c's are exactly the same.
i'm gonna give them a ring in the morning, but thought i'd get the opinion from you guys first. the only problem i think i might encounter is the fact that i've already opened up the SE110's, but really they should have sent me the correct replacements in the first place without me having to actually check i've got the right ones.
also, i'm under the impression that the SCL2's are in fact better earphones than the SE110's, even though they are very similarly priced, but is that correct? i just don't want to be cheated into receiving worser earphones than i sent in, although i would be happy to cheat them and keep the SE110's if they are in fact better
. tbh, i can't tell which are better because i've been without my E2c's for about 2 weeks! and i havn't had chance to try them out on the bus, in town, etc as the sound isolation aspect is one of the major factors
thanks for readings
ash
i'm gonna give them a ring in the morning, but thought i'd get the opinion from you guys first. the only problem i think i might encounter is the fact that i've already opened up the SE110's, but really they should have sent me the correct replacements in the first place without me having to actually check i've got the right ones.
also, i'm under the impression that the SCL2's are in fact better earphones than the SE110's, even though they are very similarly priced, but is that correct? i just don't want to be cheated into receiving worser earphones than i sent in, although i would be happy to cheat them and keep the SE110's if they are in fact better
thanks for readings
ash