Should I find a better copy or what?
Jul 8, 2012 at 4:45 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 13

Destroysall

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Posts
1,875
Likes
94
Hello all,
 
I've been doing some reading here and there on Jazz masterpiece "Kind of Blue" from Miles Davis.  I do have a CD copy that I purchased from a local Wal-Mart years ago.  I have heard that the Legacy Edition is better in quality, and wanted to know if I should go ahead and grab that edition off of Amazon.
 
Here is the Legacy Edition - http://www.amazon.com/Kind-Blue-Legacy-Miles-Davis/dp/B001KL3GZO/ref=wl_it_dp_o_npd?ie=UTF8
 
The one I have is numbered CK 64935 and it has both the Columbia and Legacy on the side and back covers.  Is there a huge difference in quality?  I know the Legacy Edition does feature an enormous pack of bonus material, which mine does not have.
 
Any info/advice would be greatly appreciated!
 
 
Destroysall
 
Jul 8, 2012 at 3:20 PM Post #2 of 13
Kind of Blue is an album that seems to attract fetishists. The differences aren't that great. Instead of buying another copy of the same album, go out and get Art Pepper Meets the Rhythm Section instead. You'll be much happier.
 
Jul 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM Post #3 of 13
It looks to me like it isn't a higher fidelity release or remastering, I think they just added the false starts and such, left off the original release. 
 
quote -
 Kind of Blue (Legacy Edition) offers the complete studio sessions on 2 CDs, including false starts, alternate takes and a 17-minute 1960 live version of "So What."
 
So if that material interests you.....
 
Jul 8, 2012 at 3:56 PM Post #4 of 13
Quote:
Kind of Blue is an album that seems to attract fetishists. The differences aren't that great. Instead of buying another copy of the same album, go out and get Art Pepper Meets the Rhythm Section instead. You'll be much happier.

Lol, I know 'So What' is as a popular track/song from Davis.  However, I am more of a 'Blue In Green' fan. :)  What made me curious was that in this thread, Head-Fi Contributor LFF recommends the 'Legacy Edition'.  He states that this edition has "FULL dynamic range of the album with minimal processing."  I was just curious if it was sonically different than the version that I currently own.
 
Also, thanks for the recommendation of Art Pepper.  I have not heard the album before, but doing some quick preview listening on iTunes, and it sounds great!  I might just take you up on that recommendation and go for it instead! :)
Quote:
It looks to me like it isn't a higher fidelity release or remastering, I think they just added the false starts and such, left off the original release. 
 
quote -
 Kind of Blue (Legacy Edition) offers the complete studio sessions on 2 CDs, including false starts, alternate takes and a 17-minute 1960 live version of "So What."
 
So if that material interests you.....

I really just wanted to know if there was a better release of the album that was worth grabbing.  I am indeed happy with mine, but I wouldn't mind going for a better remaster.
 
I am also wondering if there is a 24-Bit version of the album out there?
 
 
Jul 9, 2012 at 1:11 PM Post #7 of 13
From a quick google search it looks like the revised version was done in '92. I'm guessing that the version you have, if bought recently, probably has had the speed correction.
 
Jul 10, 2012 at 2:01 PM Post #8 of 13
Different remasters have different reputations. LFF keeps up with this stuff as part of his career, so I'd take his word on which version to get. More importantly, compare the two versions and see if the difference is worth it to you. Sensitivity to dynamic range compression varies based on your preferences and how loud you listen.
 
Jul 10, 2012 at 6:14 PM Post #9 of 13
Quote:
Different remasters have different reputations. LFF keeps up with this stuff as part of his career, so I'd take his word on which version to get. More importantly, compare the two versions and see if the difference is worth it to you. Sensitivity to dynamic range compression varies based on your preferences and how loud you listen.


I see.  Thanks very much.  I think I'll grab it and do a comparison then.  Thanks so much again!
 
Jul 10, 2012 at 6:30 PM Post #10 of 13
The 2 CD legacy edition is what you want. It's not compressed and uses better EQ than all previous releases.
 
Aside from finding the original Japan release on SACD, this is the next best thing and it's a whole lot cheaper too.
 
 
Jul 11, 2012 at 4:55 AM Post #11 of 13
Quote:
The 2 CD legacy edition is what you want. It's not compressed and uses better EQ than all previous releases.
 
Aside from finding the original Japan release on SACD, this is the next best thing and it's a whole lot cheaper too.
 


Thanks a whole lot for the confirmation, LFF.  I'm definitely going to grab the Legacy Edition!  :)  I must ask something though.  I have seen people mention SACD, and can only think they mean Super-Audio CD.  Are SACD's in 24-bit resolution?
 
Jul 13, 2012 at 12:00 AM Post #12 of 13
Quote:
Thanks a whole lot for the confirmation, LFF.  I'm definitely going to grab the Legacy Edition!  :)  I must ask something though.  I have seen people mention SACD, and can only think they mean Super-Audio CD.  Are SACD's in 24-bit resolution?


Most of them are in 24 bit. The Japan Super Audio Compact Disc (SACD) I believe is in 24\88.2 but it's expensive.
 
Get the Legacy Edition for now.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top