bluemonkeyflyer
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2011
- Posts
- 1,852
- Likes
- 405
I just received my Sharkk Bravo headphones from Indiegogo, today, and searched the forums for an impressions thread. I didn't find any and decided to start one.
These closed-back headphones are a hybrid of electrostatic and dynamic drivers with the electrostatic energizers built-in to the cups. They are advertised as "High Definition" and "10x Better Sound Quality." The marketing documents also describe them as, "The most affordable Hybrid Electrostatic Headphones® with Hi-Fi sound, power bass, & noise isolation."
I will hold off on posting my impressions until I've had a chance to listen to them for extended sessions. Please post your impressions to this thread.
Update
These are my measurements using a calibrated EMM-6 mic, compensation curve, Steinberg UR22, Centrance Dacmini, Windows 7, and ARTA.
I measured Sharkk Bravo and Sennheiser HD650 for comparison using the same setup and procedures.
What you want is a flat line from left to right on the FR Magnitude Graph and fast decay on the CSD time axis.
I listened to a variety of music, with SPL matching for both headphones, before making these measurements. I concluded that Sharkk Bravo has a huge mid-bass hump that bloats/muffles/veils the midrange frequencies and that the treble frequencies are significantly attenuated...no extension or micro-details. What I heard was confirmed by the 100 Hz hump and treble roll off shown in the measurement graphs.
Sharkk Bravo SPL Frequency Response and Distortion
Sennheiser HD650 SPL Frequency Response and Distortion
Sharkk Bravo CSD
Sennheiser HD650 CSD
_____________________________________________________________________
Update: First Modification
Well, I don't know about that but I am trying. I opened them up and attempted some mods, today. I added Acoustipak over the back of the electret capsule, Paxmate Plus in the cup floor, and stuffed some cotton inside the bottom of the cup where the headband strap is inserted. There is a huge amount of venting, there, and I hoped by stuffing it with cotton that the bass would be tamed. Result? No joy.
This first mod configuration shifted the bass hump from 100 Hz to 200 Hz and minimally elevated the treble. Sharkk Bravo still has no treble detail and remains overwhelmed by Boomy Bass Bloat. I may try a few more mods...anyone have any ideas?...but the ear cushions will not tolerate more than 2 or 3 modding cycles before becoming too loose to fit back into the groove between the baffle and cup. They're also very difficult to put back on. You have to turn them inside out and carefully pull/push them into the groove while holding in place as you work your way around.
The build/materials used are cheap: the cups are thin plastic that undoubtedly resonate. The yokes are plastic. The headband cushion cover and side straps look and feel like vinyl. The cable is flimsy and prone to memory bending. There was no 1/4" adapter, bag, or extra ear cushions that were supposed to be included.
Personally, I would not pay more than $20 for these if I had the chance to do it all over, again. "High Res Audio" and "10x Better Sound" is the epitome of hyperbole.
Baffle Side
Underside of Baffle
Underside of Electret Circuit Board and Dynamic Driver
Light shows venting
Inside of
cup
First modification does not help
Modified FR Magnitude
~BMF
These closed-back headphones are a hybrid of electrostatic and dynamic drivers with the electrostatic energizers built-in to the cups. They are advertised as "High Definition" and "10x Better Sound Quality." The marketing documents also describe them as, "The most affordable Hybrid Electrostatic Headphones® with Hi-Fi sound, power bass, & noise isolation."
I will hold off on posting my impressions until I've had a chance to listen to them for extended sessions. Please post your impressions to this thread.
Update
These are my measurements using a calibrated EMM-6 mic, compensation curve, Steinberg UR22, Centrance Dacmini, Windows 7, and ARTA.
I measured Sharkk Bravo and Sennheiser HD650 for comparison using the same setup and procedures.
What you want is a flat line from left to right on the FR Magnitude Graph and fast decay on the CSD time axis.
I listened to a variety of music, with SPL matching for both headphones, before making these measurements. I concluded that Sharkk Bravo has a huge mid-bass hump that bloats/muffles/veils the midrange frequencies and that the treble frequencies are significantly attenuated...no extension or micro-details. What I heard was confirmed by the 100 Hz hump and treble roll off shown in the measurement graphs.
Sharkk Bravo SPL Frequency Response and Distortion
Sennheiser HD650 SPL Frequency Response and Distortion
Sharkk Bravo CSD
Sennheiser HD650 CSD
_____________________________________________________________________
Update: First Modification
Well, I don't know about that but I am trying. I opened them up and attempted some mods, today. I added Acoustipak over the back of the electret capsule, Paxmate Plus in the cup floor, and stuffed some cotton inside the bottom of the cup where the headband strap is inserted. There is a huge amount of venting, there, and I hoped by stuffing it with cotton that the bass would be tamed. Result? No joy.
This first mod configuration shifted the bass hump from 100 Hz to 200 Hz and minimally elevated the treble. Sharkk Bravo still has no treble detail and remains overwhelmed by Boomy Bass Bloat. I may try a few more mods...anyone have any ideas?...but the ear cushions will not tolerate more than 2 or 3 modding cycles before becoming too loose to fit back into the groove between the baffle and cup. They're also very difficult to put back on. You have to turn them inside out and carefully pull/push them into the groove while holding in place as you work your way around.
The build/materials used are cheap: the cups are thin plastic that undoubtedly resonate. The yokes are plastic. The headband cushion cover and side straps look and feel like vinyl. The cable is flimsy and prone to memory bending. There was no 1/4" adapter, bag, or extra ear cushions that were supposed to be included.
Personally, I would not pay more than $20 for these if I had the chance to do it all over, again. "High Res Audio" and "10x Better Sound" is the epitome of hyperbole.
Baffle Side
Underside of Baffle
Underside of Electret Circuit Board and Dynamic Driver
Light shows venting
Inside of
cup
First modification does not help
Modified FR Magnitude
~BMF