Ramtha604
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 12
Quote:
Ok, I just went over to my bro's room and lent the PX200 from him for a quick comparison. I sought out a song with nice, deepreaching, fat bass (*Atmos - Average Beverage*) from my goa playlist and am currently listening to it with the PX-100 from my Fortissimo II with the windows volume set to 80% (you can already hear the phones are not capable of reproducing the bass without distorting it at 90% but at 80% volume it sounds just fine).
This song has the kind of bass that will make cheap subwoofers sound really bad at higher volumes and the PX-100 handles it just nicely at moderate volume (I usually listen a bit higher if the equipment allows it).
(*plugging out the 100's and plugging in the 200's*.)
I don't know what exactly is up with the 200's but the bass sounds really thumpy on these, with the highs sounding artificially loud. Lowering the volume doesn't change this so it seems that these simply have a serious midbass hump, with quite a rolloff below it. Highs still really stick out from the rest of the spectrum - I guess this should make them sound more detailed than the 100's?
Another experiment with the 200's: I turn the volume up to 100% and press them against my head. Moving them down, directly over the entrance of my ear canal and really pressing them against my ears actually makes the bass sound decent, however the highs are still annoyingly loud compared to the mids and bass. Besides that running around, pressing the PX200's against ones ear canal isn't really an option for most uf us anyway, I guess.
IMO the 200's are no competition for the balanced-sounding PX100 regardless of their price... anyone who has the chance to compare them is encouraged to do so, but anyone who can't I can really recommend the PX100 over the PX200 with good conscience.
No comment about the PX250 here as I have never heard them myself.
Best regareds,
Roland
Originally posted by lini (in another thread) ramtha: I can't get proper bass out of my PX200 - even when I play around with placement. Do you have better experiences with the PX100? |
Ok, I just went over to my bro's room and lent the PX200 from him for a quick comparison. I sought out a song with nice, deepreaching, fat bass (*Atmos - Average Beverage*) from my goa playlist and am currently listening to it with the PX-100 from my Fortissimo II with the windows volume set to 80% (you can already hear the phones are not capable of reproducing the bass without distorting it at 90% but at 80% volume it sounds just fine).
This song has the kind of bass that will make cheap subwoofers sound really bad at higher volumes and the PX-100 handles it just nicely at moderate volume (I usually listen a bit higher if the equipment allows it).
(*plugging out the 100's and plugging in the 200's*.)
I don't know what exactly is up with the 200's but the bass sounds really thumpy on these, with the highs sounding artificially loud. Lowering the volume doesn't change this so it seems that these simply have a serious midbass hump, with quite a rolloff below it. Highs still really stick out from the rest of the spectrum - I guess this should make them sound more detailed than the 100's?
Another experiment with the 200's: I turn the volume up to 100% and press them against my head. Moving them down, directly over the entrance of my ear canal and really pressing them against my ears actually makes the bass sound decent, however the highs are still annoyingly loud compared to the mids and bass. Besides that running around, pressing the PX200's against ones ear canal isn't really an option for most uf us anyway, I guess.
IMO the 200's are no competition for the balanced-sounding PX100 regardless of their price... anyone who has the chance to compare them is encouraged to do so, but anyone who can't I can really recommend the PX100 over the PX200 with good conscience.
No comment about the PX250 here as I have never heard them myself.
Best regareds,
Roland