Solude
Headphoneus Supremus
Soloist but Mjolnir has quite a bit more swing. Depth or attack, pick your poison.
Hi guys, i'm looking to unshackle myself from my desktop computer's sound card (Asus Xonar d2x) and upgrade my amp/cans. My eventual goal is a Gungnir/Mjolnir with a set of Beyerdynamic T1/Audeze LCD-2/Sennheiser HD800 depending on which I end up liking the most.
I read in the Yggdrasil/Ragnarok thread (which are regrettably out of my price range ) some comments that suggested Schiit 'voice' their gear using Audeze cans. I presume this means they do their testing/tuning etc. with Audeze equipment. Will this make a difference to my headphone selection? It doesn't seem like it would but as I haven't managed to Google up any info I thought I would ask.
Thanks
I'd recommend the M51 if you're going with orthos. M51 made the HD800 boring, while the Gungnir was a bit too exciting.
And I wouldn't pay the M51's asking price, no way no how, it's not worth it.
I think gung pairs well with orthos, or a least the lcd3 with the mojo worked well with the 3's layed back nature. Gung also seems to be pairing well with 007 I'm using now which is also layed back.
Now if there was only a circlotron stat amp to pair with it.....
The M51 strikes a good balance with the HD800 IMO and I know others that share the view. Don't quite get how it could be construed as "boring", but that's your take.
Also, there are markets outside of the US where the Gungnir is a $1000+ dac and the M51 can be had for a little more. A no brainer when you factor in the sonic improvements and additional features.
While there are likely measureable differences between the M51 and the Gungnir I would be willing to bet in a blind testing situation over enough trials to account for chance, it would be very difficult to reliably pick the two DACs apart. We all think our “audio-memory” is that good, but that isn’t really how the brain works. We can store certain gross concepts of a sound in memory, but we are unable to actually “warehouse” any sound which ultimately means that once you stop listening to a piece of equipment, whatever detailed sound characteristics you noticed before will have to be re-detected by your brain each time. So when we sell our gear and have a period of time until the new gear arrives suddenly we hear the new gear as being so much better, but how accurate do you really think your auditory memory of your past equipment really was? Is it possible that you don’t actually have an accurate mental representation of that equipment left in memory?
Stay updated on Audio-Technica at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|