tomscy2000
Headphoneus Supremus
Quote:
Yes, the CK100Pro is decidedly on the heavy side. For what it's worth, I do think the K3003 is a superior earphone (though I would rather buy the CK100PRO) as it does do a good job with sibilance control while still retaining a lot of sparkle. The CK100PRO can sound hot on the treble with some sibilance-prone tracks. The TO GO 334, on the other hand, probably has more conservative treble than both of the other two. Check out Sonove's measurements of all three. AnakChan just posted some impressions of the 334, as well.
Nice reviews on these, i wonder how ck100pro is compared with k3003s and fitear mh 334.
I tried ck100pro but its isolation is not as good as ck100 and also feels heavier.
looking for more impressions before deciding on which one to get. Also looking forward to jokers fitear 334.
Yes, the CK100Pro is decidedly on the heavy side. For what it's worth, I do think the K3003 is a superior earphone (though I would rather buy the CK100PRO) as it does do a good job with sibilance control while still retaining a lot of sparkle. The CK100PRO can sound hot on the treble with some sibilance-prone tracks. The TO GO 334, on the other hand, probably has more conservative treble than both of the other two. Check out Sonove's measurements of all three. AnakChan just posted some impressions of the 334, as well.