[Review] Aurisonics Rockets...Endgame.
Jul 16, 2015 at 5:02 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 28
Joined
Jul 22, 2011
Posts
7,049
Likes
1,168
Introduction
 ​
 ​
 ​
 
In audio circles, the word "endgame" generally refers to a headphone or audio chain component that is practically without fault, and performs at a high enough level to render future purchases relatively redundant. In my case, I've owned my pair of Rockets since September of last year, and I've had absolutely zero desire to spend a single cent on another IEM since then. What I'll attempt to do with this review is to explain why this is the case, and hopefully by the end of it you'll find my endgame label justified.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ​
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
My first encounter with the Aurisonics Rockets came during a tour put on by member @Idsynchrono_24 last year. I remember not being able to remove them from my ears, and I'd end up spending the entire night rediscovering my library. I knew immediately that the sound I was hearing was one of the best, if not the very best, I'd heard to that point. Still, the sound is only a part of why I consider the Rockets my endgame phones. I'll get to the sound quality later, but I want to start with a quick description of the Rockets.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Build
 
 
 
 
The release date of the Rockets got pushed back several times, by almost a year in total. The guys at Aurisonics went back to the drawing board several times to ensure the final product was up to spec. Most of us backers got quite anxious during the process, but I have to say the wait was worth having the build quality.
 
The shell is made from 100% solid titanium. Titanium. All of it. Furthermore, the cable is made from ballistics grade aramid fibers. The result is an iem that has proven near indestructible. I've put my pair through near hell this last year. I've left it at the bottom of a backpack that contains medical books that weigh over 5 pounds each. I've left it in my car during Louisiana summers, where you could leave a raw chicken in your car in the morning and have rotisserie for dinner at the end of the day. I've taken showers while wearing the Rockets...hot showers. Yet, they work like the day they came in the mail and there's hardly a scratch on them, like you can see in the photos above. This is for an IEM that costs $250 retail, and under $200 on the used markets. That's less than a quarter of what other "top tier" IEMs cost nowadays, and you still have to baby those things. 
 
Furthermore, the Rockets themselves are tiny. Crazy tiny. As shown above, it's a fraction of the size of a quarter-dollar (US currency). In theory, this should make fit fairly effortless. The Rockets are also sealed, so isolation is insane. I've been doing a lot of driving this summer, but my car has an older V6 engine that is merciless with gas. I've been driving with the windows slightly down to avoid using the AC and save some gas. At 80mph, the wind noise should be intolerable, but with the Rockets in I can barely hear a thing. Airplane rides have become so smooth. If it weren't for the seat vibrations, I'd forget I was sitting next to a screaming jet engine at 35,000 ft. That is how good the isolation is.
 
The cable of the Rockets is sturdy, to say the least. If there's any damage to it, it definitely wouldn't be accidental. There are youtube videos of people using the Rockets to pull cars. The downside of this is that the cable itself is relatively heavy. This, when combined with the light weight of the shells, could create problems if you wear them straight down without a very good seal when moving around. The cables are heavy enough to pull the Rockets from your ears. At least that's been my experience.
 
Overall, the build of the Rockets give me confidence they'll last as long as I want them around. 
 
 
 
 
 
Sound
 ​
 ​
 ​
There are two very important, practically critical, considerations that must be made when discussing the sound of the Rockets.
 
The first is that the Rockets are far from sensitive. My ideal listening level on my iPhone 6 with most IEMs is around 35% volume. With the Rockets, that jumps to near 70% to achieve the same "loudness". 
 
The most important consideration to make when evaluating the Rockets is its physical design. The Rockets are very small sealed IEMs. There's literally nowhere for air to escape when inserted, and the titanium shell doesn't allow for any expansion of the housing to accommodate the extra pressure. The design of the ear can accommodate for this by allowing the pressure to equalize via the Eustachian Tube, which is located behind the eardrum. The equalization of pressure is a very necessary process for IEMs to sound "right" This is because of the nature of our eardrums. The eardrum needs to be able to vibrate freely in order for us to interpret the vibrations in the air as sound. Faster vibrations are interpreted as treble, and the slower vibrations come across as bass and mids. When the internal pressure of the ear canal is uneven, this impairs the ability of the eardrum to vibrate, and treble and bass will be affected as a result.
 
Exhibit A
 
SouAk.gif

 
 
 
If, for whatever reason, one's Eustachian Tube cannot compensate for the large amount of pressure placed on the eardrum by the Rockets, then you really won't be able to hear what the Rockets can do. Especially, you'll hear the Rockets as bass light and the treble will be very laid back.
 
 
Luckily, this problem is easily sidestepped, as I've done for the last year. Simply pop off those silicone tips and replace them with foams. The was foam tips create a seal is fundamentally different from the way silicone tips do. Silicone tips seal by creating a vacuum, compounding the pressure effect I discussed earlier. Foam tips simply use bulk to block off the ear canal. That's why you compress them before insertion so they can they fill up and occlude the ear canal. They're also porous, allows the free movement of air and a lack of any direct pressure. I also trim down the excess foam to avoid those stereotypical foam side effects. What's left after this is the pure, beautiful sound of the Aurisonics Rockets that has made me pretty much stay out of other IEM threads.
 
 
With all that out of the way, I'll try to describe how I hear the Rockets sound.
 
On a macroscopic level, the Rockets are fairly linear sounding, with extra energy in the upper mids, smooth treble, and bass that is linear until about 40Hz where it starts to roll off. It's when you start to look at the quality of each of the parts that you truly begin to appreciate the way this thing sounds.
 
When I first listened to the Rockets, I was instantly transported to an experience I had a couple of years ago when I first heard the Stax SR-009. I was struck by the SR-009's incredible transparency. It was like getting Lasik eye surgery and realizing just how bad your vision was before. When I closed my eyes and sat back, I felt like the music came alive around me. Everything was so clean, so present , so alive. It was truly an experience. This is how the Rockets are, only on an IEM scale.
 
First, the Rockets are incredibly transparent. There's zero bloat. Zero glare. Just a drink a cool water on a summer day. The microdriver used here is among the quickest I've ever come across, which contributes to the cleanliness of the sound. This is an absolute treat when listening to the intricate melodies in genres like Hip Hop, Drum and Bass, EDM, and Metal.
 
The second most remarkable thing about the Rockets its imaging prowess. The combination of driver speed and transparency allows the listener to effortlessly pick out every sound cue in space with pin point accuracy. The effect is particularly stunning when listening to a track like Miles Davis' "So What?". Close your eyes, and you'll be transported to Columbia Studios and you'll be tempted to reach out and pluck the bass yourself. That's how tangible the images are.
 
Next is the Rockets' impeccable timbre. As an amateur musician myself, I'm kind of a sticker for my gear to represent instruments and vocals like they would in person. The Rockets excel at this, especially in the treble. Listening to "Hold On" by The Alabama Shakes, everything is how it should be, even the delicious thud of the kick drum.
 
 
Breaking down the individual frequency groups, we'll start with
 
 
Bass
 
The most surprising thing about the Rockets' bass in the sheer amount of impact its capable of, given the clean nature of the overall signature. I've never listened to a song and thought the Rockets could do with more bass. Not even with the infamous Whisper song from the Ying Yang Twins.
 
Otherwise, the bass is extremely clean and beautifully quick. Intricate hip hop beats are done full justice here. There are even rapid fire section to my favorite songs I was never able to pick up prior to the rockets. Sadly, the Rockets quickly start to lose energy below 40Hz. However, not a lot of music actually uses any information below this point. Unless you truly want a head banging experience, the Rockets will be more than enough on the low end. (A-)
 
Midrange
 
Wow. Just...wow. Hands down, best vocals I've heard from an IEM...and I've heard a lot. I'd write more, but the rest of the paragraph would just be a list of synonyms for the word Amazing. (A+++)
 
Treble
 
Weighty. Refined. A total lack of glare. Timbre is also fantastic here. Sometimes I wonder if a bit more sparkle would be welcome, but I can't see how they could have integrated it without throwing off the total balance. I personally like it as it is. Listening to "Crystals" from the new Of Monsters and Men album, cymbals are prominent in the second half of the track, and the Rockets convey them with the weighty metalic goodness I'd expect in real life. (A-)
 
 
 
 
 ​
 ​
Conclusion
 ​
 ​
 ​
I've procrastinated writing this for a while, partly because I haven't had time and also because I knew I wanted to make sure I fleshed out my thoughts well enough.
 
The Rockets are pretty amazing for my uses. It's not completely perfect, though. Physically, the cable is heavy enough to affect fit if you don't have a good enough seal. Also the soundstage, while having amazing imaging, isn't as tall as I'm used to coming from the custom-shaped universals like the ASG-2, UERM, etc. I'm not sure if there's anything they could do, as I've found that soundstage height is a quality of these custom shaped IEMs.
 
Still, the Rockets tick almost every single box. They're indestructible. They sound great. And you can get them for under $200. There's truly nothing else I could ask for. Plus, it's freed up a bunch of money for other wallet-burning hobbies.
 
The only thing problem is that the best phone I've heard looks kinda like an anal probe and is named "Rocket", not Project XKR437847. And it wasn't marketed to us audiophiles lol. Sigh.
 
Jul 17, 2015 at 8:45 AM Post #3 of 28
Very nice write-up eke2k6. Endgame isn't just about the sound. It's nice to see someone find something that is nearly perfect for their use and preferences. 
 
The Rockets have jumped a few places in my wishlist. Now to wrangle an audition from somewhere.
 
Just for a reference, and I know this will probably be from memory, but... could you give me a short comparo with the RE272?
 
Jul 17, 2015 at 2:28 PM Post #5 of 28
+1 to the positive reception. The Rockets are a great product and value.
 
Jul 17, 2015 at 2:49 PM Post #7 of 28
 
When I first listened to the Rockets, I was instantly transported to an experience I had a couple of years ago when I first heard the Stax SR-009. I was struck by the SR-009's incredible transparency. It was like getting Lasik eye surgery and realizing just how bad your vision was before. When I closed my eyes and sat back, I felt like the music came alive around me. Everything was so clean, so present , so alive. It was truly an experience. This is how the Rockets are, only on an IEM scale.​
 

 
Lambda. Now. You need one. Haven't heard the 009, but you seriously need to get yourself a Lambda Eke. The 207 is just STUPIDLY  good for the money. You see that? I had to capitalize, italicize, underline, embiggen (a perfectly cromulent word btw) and ******* color the letters to emphasize my point, and that still isn't enough. Pound for pound, still the absolute best phone I've ever heard, and an absolute technical juggernaut. 
 
Oh yeah, cool review man lol
 
Jul 17, 2015 at 7:18 PM Post #9 of 28
Thanks guys!
 
 
Quote:
 
 
Just for a reference, and I know this will probably be from memory, but... could you give me a short comparo with the RE272?

 
 
yeah, this will definitely be from memory. I can't give specifics on how they compare, but I can tell you my general impressions of each.
 
The RE272 sounded really good to me. However, I ultimately found it a bit too...something. I don't have the exact word. It was almost like listening to fairy dust. I remember thinking there was a general lack of oomph when it came to dynamic range. My favorite classical pieces didn't come across with the gusto I was used to. I remember thinking of the RE272 kind of like the IEM version of Ariana Grande...if that makes any sense.
 
The Rockets maintain the technical prowess, but drastically improve on the other fronts I found lacking. Everything carries more weight, and it's capable of portraying power when needed.
 
   
X2, and excellent photos to boot.
smile_phones.gif

 
Yeah, I fondly remember the Rockets' midrange, one of the best I've ever heard.
 
Miles Davis played bass?
wink.gif
 

 
No, but his bassist did 
tongue.gif

 
 
   
Lambda. Now. You need one. Haven't heard the 009, but you seriously need to get yourself a Lambda Eke. The 207 is just STUPIDLY  good for the money. You see that? I had to capitalize, italicize, underline, embiggen (a perfectly cromulent word btw) and ******* color the letters to emphasize my point, and that still isn't enough. Pound for pound, still the absolute best phone I've ever heard, and an absolute technical juggernaut. 
 
Oh yeah, cool review man lol

 
 
Dammit. And here I was thinking I could ride off into the sunset with the Rockets and HD600 (if I eventually repurchased it).
 
I think I've hesitated because I'm not sold on the low end. I loved the SR-009's ability to deliver some serious slam, despite the otherworldly transparency. Is it the same with the Lambda?
 
Jul 17, 2015 at 8:08 PM Post #10 of 28
  Dammit. And here I was thinking I could ride off into the sunset with the Rockets and HD600 (if I eventually repurchased it).
 
I think I've hesitated because I'm not sold on the low end. I loved the SR-009's ability to deliver some serious slam, despite the otherworldly transparency. Is it the same with the Lambda?

 
Otherworldly transparency? Check. Visceral slam? Double check. One of the things I'll probably never understand is why people think stats sound thin or have no bass. You know that linear extension that the UERM has? Think that, but with actual air and palpable weight to it. As much as I love the liquid and articulate low ends of phones like the UERM and the Angie (which has more palpable weight to it down low than the UERM), they just can't replicate that thudding sensation and weight that moving air generates. I've recently heard the HE1000 and I honestly don't think the Stax is all that far behind in bass. I don't find it any less satisfying TBH. Dynamics on the Stax are just excellent, lightning quick attack equates to some awesome slam on kicks, snares and synth bass lines. (Queue up New Order's Low Life or Justice's Cross and it'll make a believer out of you) Treble is a class apart from anything else I've heard, seriously clean, smooth and properly weighted. And you're never gonna get the sort of super aired out, open soundstaging that the 207 offers in any IEM. All in all, think UERM on a larger scale, more air and with better bass/treble and you have a good picture of how it sounds. The single caveat to all of this is that the 207 needs volume to come alive. Listening at lower volumes translates to a meek, small and restrained performance. 
 
Jul 17, 2015 at 10:05 PM Post #11 of 28
   
Otherworldly transparency? Check. Visceral slam? Double check. One of the things I'll probably never understand is why people think stats sound thin or have no bass. You know that linear extension that the UERM has? Think that, but with actual air and palpable weight to it. As much as I love the liquid and articulate low ends of phones like the UERM and the Angie (which has more palpable weight to it down low than the UERM), they just can't replicate that thudding sensation and weight that moving air generates. I've recently heard the HE1000 and I honestly don't think the Stax is all that far behind in bass. I don't find it any less satisfying TBH. Dynamics on the Stax are just excellent, lightning quick attack equates to some awesome slam on kicks, snares and synth bass lines. (Queue up New Order's Low Life or Justice's Cross and it'll make a believer out of you) Treble is a class apart from anything else I've heard, seriously clean, smooth and properly weighted. And you're never gonna get the sort of super aired out, open soundstaging that the 207 offers in any IEM. All in all, think UERM on a larger scale, more air and with better bass/treble and you have a good picture of how it sounds. The single caveat to all of this is that the 207 needs volume to come alive. Listening at lower volumes translates to a meek, small and restrained performance. 

 
 
The fact that you've had them this long speaks volumes by itself. Sending you a PM.
 
Jul 17, 2015 at 11:56 PM Post #13 of 28
There is something drastically better than rocket in terms of SQ only ( note: not durability).

R2A.

Many ppl who had the rocket observed same thing myself included. Significantly better bass, similar midrange but with better resolution. More present treble without being fatiguing. Bigger soundstage width, depth. Transparency, timbre.

Also slightly better isolation. Housing is Smaller than rocket. Pressure balanced like ADEL technology.

I really wanted to keep the rocket since I can really torture it but in the end i had to let it go.

 
 
I really don't mean to be dismissive, but I seriously doubt that's the case. With the comparisons I've made with the Rockets and several other phones, not a single one has been drastically better...or "better" at all for my uses.
 
Your issues with the rockets sound pressure related, IMO. That's why I think a lot of people haven't heard the phones in their proper element. Trust me, foam tips are the way to go with phones that are so pressurized. This goes beyond the Rockets. I've used foamies exclusively with the likes of the TG334, UERM, etc. Example:
 

 
Jul 18, 2015 at 12:11 AM Post #14 of 28
I really don't mean to be dismissive, but I seriously doubt that's the case. With the comparisons I've made with the Rockets and several other phones, not a single one has been drastically better...or "better" at all for my uses.

Your issues with the rockets sound pressure related, IMO. That's why I think a lot of people haven't heard the phones in their proper element. Trust me, foam tips are the way to go with phones that are so pressurized. This goes beyond the Rockets. I've used foamies exclusively with the likes of the TG334, UERM, etc. Example:




I used rocket with foam tips (pretty good quality) that came with DSG100 and comply (modded) before and while I liked them more than the stock sureseal tips ultimately I settled with spinfit which gave me the best balance of SQ, comfort ease of insertion. JVC spiral dot was ok, but gave me too much pressure.

You really should try to grab a hold of R2A from someone and give it a shot. I was doubtful when I exchanged few PMs with people who had both while waiting mine to arrive.

I mean don't get me wrong rockets were very good IEM and i loved its build quality. Even sound quality wise I much preferred Rockets over my other IEMs namely IE800, W4R, ASG1.3, B3 pro1 and dsg100.

But then R2A and R2PRO arrived..
 
Jul 18, 2015 at 12:23 AM Post #15 of 28
Congrats with your endgame!! I can very easily follow you and why, except for your choice of analogies..  Both the Rockets and HD600 are absolutely great choices to settle with and both scales up way above their price/performance ratio and also won't kill most people's budget (in this place only!). No need to look much further when preferences are a balanced sound with a natural, seductive, sweet sounding midrange and a smooth, well extended treble performance. 
 
Of course there will always be someone, even in this thread, telling you that you're completely wrong and that you need to try/buy their latest favorite flavor which typically last for a couple of weeks and so it goes :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top