@animeismylife you should pursue Tidal for credit, but those downloads would not have helped you make the same comparison anyway. Maybe you knew that already, but now I'm confused so please allow me to go on for a bit.
I was referring to bit rate as a measure of streaming, not in downloaded files for local use which may not be the same source as used on the streaming services. I monitored the bit rates while streaming via UAPP for Android, which integrates both services. I cannot see bit rates in the companies' own apps for Windows or Android. Qobuz streaming bit rates are lower than Tidal for 16/44.1 tracks, but higher for all or most "Hi-Res" tracks. (I mostly stream music, but since you mentioned download sales I will say that Qobuz is much more engaged in that part of the business, with an emphasis on high resolution files and a better reputation overall. Your experience proves once again that Tidal really isn't serious about that aspect of music sales.)
Qobuz continues to work more smoothly for me than Tidal, particularly on Windows where the Tidal app often freezes between and sometimes even during tracks. I also prefer the new highlighted new music and other suggestions on Qobuz. Tidal emphasizes music by or preferred by its owners and their fans.