Pictures of Your Portable Rig (part XVI)
Dec 9, 2015 at 1:00 PM Post #18,631 of 37,713
Dec 9, 2015 at 1:41 PM Post #18,632 of 37,713
 
(currently at 1.257 albums)


You only have one album? And less than a third of another?

wink.gif


I am learning german in mexico like in the usa we use comma "," as thousands separator in german they use the dot "." so he's implying 1, 257
 
I have 2, 540+ albums
 
Dec 9, 2015 at 1:43 PM Post #18,633 of 37,713
Curious...what is the sample rate of your 24bit files?


All different - the highest I could get of that release.
I have 24/44, 24/48, 24/88, 24/96 and 24/192, maybe one at 24/176.
 
To my ears, on my rigs, 24bit is the real upgrade. 24/44 sounds nearly as impressive as 24/192 to me but of course i'm not comparing the same release.  My experience shows the jump in quality from 16/44 to 24/44 is slightly larger than from 24/44 to 24/192. There's something in the extra data space of 24bit that gives an effective bitrate over 2000k that seems to hold most of the magic to me, not the continually higher sampling rates.
 
Dec 9, 2015 at 2:54 PM Post #18,634 of 37,713
24/192 of poorly mastered albums is even worse than 256kbps of properly mastered albums. Personally I can't listen to any rips with any noise background except for concert recording.
 
When jack pot is struck, the improvement in audio from hardware tweaking (aka trial and error) can be massive in comparison to the relatively minor improvement from the digitals. Without a sound stage big enough, extensions deep enough, weight/power in notes heavy enough and separations clear enough to present the music, nothing really matters. 
 
Dec 9, 2015 at 4:30 PM Post #18,636 of 37,713
The Mojo have the same components as the Hugo, including the DAC, the differences are the amplifier, features, input, size and....price :)

The Mojo has been optimized for iems and on-ear headphones, the Hugo has been made to handle high impedance full size headphones.


This is misinformation. The DAC hardware is different - more advanced in the Mojo - but the programming is similar, but again slightly different. Both devices don't have a seperate amp section, they simply use the discrete analogue stage from the DAC.

The analogue section is mostly the same between the Mojo and the Hugo except Rob Watts used three small resistors in the Mojo instead of two large ones in the Hugo to accommodate the Mojo's small size. Other than that the analogue output is identical to the Hugo. In other words both can power full sized headphones with the same power performance. The power from the Mojo is remarkable and is measured at 5.3Vrms with a peak output of 7V. The only thing Rob did for the Mojo specifically for portable use is tune it slightly warmer which suites me fine.

You can read my review with an interview with the designer Rob Watts that explains what the differences are. It's good know what you are saying before you spread misinformation. :wink:
 
Dec 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM Post #18,637 of 37,713
  this man speaks the truth its all in the master


he speaks half of the truth. the master is critical of course, as is the overall mix, the quality of instrument played, the quality of performance. oh yeah - the song is kinda important too.
 
you can't just dismiss the format though. it's not one or the other.  assuming the same mastering session - why have the engineer downgrade the audio other than for convenience or cheapness?
 
badly mastered 24/192 vs. well mastered 256k?  neither, thank you.
 
i don't listen to badly mastered anything as far as i'm concerned. if i found it to be poorly mastered i would cease listening to it. there's all sorts of modern bands that might not suck but i avoid because of the loudness problems.
 
Dec 9, 2015 at 5:29 PM Post #18,639 of 37,713

 
RWAK240 + SE846 via 2.5mm. Excuse the uggo RSA to 2.5mm adapter lol.
 
Dec 9, 2015 at 5:31 PM Post #18,640 of 37,713
I thought this was a pictures thread
eek.gif
LOL
 

 
Dec 9, 2015 at 5:52 PM Post #18,641 of 37,713
I am learning german in mexico like in the usa we use comma "," as thousands separator in german they use the dot "." so he's implying 1, 257

I have 2, 540+ albums


How do the Germans accommodate the decimal point?
 
Dec 9, 2015 at 6:50 PM Post #18,642 of 37,713
 
I am learning german in mexico like in the usa we use comma "," as thousands separator in german they use the dot "." so he's implying 1, 257

I have 2, 540+ albums


How do the Germans accommodate the decimal point?


they use the comma for decimal separators
biggrin.gif
 hahaha at first i was baffled and took a bit of time to get used to it as we usa and mexico use decimal point for decimals and comma for thousands
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top