I believe the major difference for me is more lively mids and more bass oomph. .
This is your mod for the PM-2? Can you please link to the entire mod?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=pm-2+mod
it's the first hit.
I believe the major difference for me is more lively mids and more bass oomph. .
This is your mod for the PM-2? Can you please link to the entire mod?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=pm-2+mod
it's the first hit.
I've finally picked a PM2 up (had the PM3 for a while) and so far I'm impressed - great 'all around' headphone. Given it is travel friendly as well, I'm thinking it is pretty underrated round these parts...
Great depth presentation in the stage, and a tonality which seems to make everything sound good - not what you always want of course, but a great trick if done well.
Has anyone upgraded the stock cables - any recommendations on that line?
I've finally picked a PM2 up (had the PM3 for a while) and so far I'm impressed - great 'all around' headphone. Given it is travel friendly as well, I'm thinking it is pretty underrated round these parts...
Great depth presentation in the stage, and a tonality which seems to make everything sound good - not what you always want of course, but a great trick if done well.
Has anyone upgraded the stock cables - any recommendations on that line?
I've finally picked a PM2 up (had the PM3 for a while) and so far I'm impressed - great 'all around' headphone. Given it is travel friendly as well, I'm thinking it is pretty underrated round these parts...
Great depth presentation in the stage, and a tonality which seems to make everything sound good - not what you always want of course, but a great trick if done well.
Has anyone upgraded the stock cables - any recommendations on that line?
I am new here first time poster. I just got the PM 2 today really just from reading you guys posts. I also got the Mojo 4 days ago from reading the Mojo posts. I am only 3 hours into the burn in. Can't wait for tomorrow to have a real listen. Thanks guys and gals.
Are PM-1 pads worth purchasing? Do they make that big of a difference?
May i ask you a question, thefitz?
You own HE-560 and PM-2 both at the same time.
I own HE-560 and I'm having a finger on a trigger to buy PM-2 in order to have different sound signature - meaning I'll be having HE-560 and PM-2 both at the same time as well.
Are they different?
Or I'll end up having two very similar headphones which is not my intention.
Which is closer to HE-560 - Audeze LCD 2.2 or PM-2?
* I had a chance to listen to Audeze LCD 2.2 (fazor) and they did sound similar to my HE-560 - so I decided that having HE-560 and LCD 2.2 both didn't make any sense.
How did the LCD-2.2 and HE-560 sound similar to you? I find them very very different, in fact. I find the HE-560 to be much brighter, almost hard in the treble, with not nearly as much bass content as the LCD-2.2.
I find the PM-2 to be most similar to the LCD-2.2 in fact. I think they have an overall similar sound signature: The PM-2 has a bit less of an overwhelming bass presence, and a bit more of a present, albeit coarser, treble presence.
The main difference between the 3 sets is that the HE-560 and LCD-2.2 straight-up need amplification (the HE-560 in particular), but the PM-2 does not. On my Lyr, I often run the HE-560 between 11:00 and 1:00, and the LCD-2.2 between 10:00 and 12:00. The PM-2 can damage your ears at 10:00.
My main goal is to get a Pono cable for my PM-2 and use it exclusively with my Pono, but I can't fathom paying >50% of the price of my Pono for a ******* cable.
EDIT: My 2.2 is non-fazor. It's a little pedantic but typically when you say "2.2" you're implying non-fazor, and "2.2 with fazor" is just "2F". All there's no "2.1F", so it's a little redundant putting the ".2" when discussing Fazors.