[aroon]

does anyone here use notmad explorer with their jukebox? specifically the zen series. they advertise a lot of enhancements including performance [like file transfer rates] and things like a webserver. it sounds to me like all this stuff is actually ON the player which sounds pretty cool but makes me wonder: has anyone made note of their battery life before and after using notmad explorer?

 

[callanish]

I've owned the combination of the Zen NX with Notmad for the last three months. Unfortunately, I haven't used the Zen with any of the creative software that was supplied with the player, so I can't really compare.

THe only comment I can make about battery life is it can go south really fast if it's hooked up to the computer while you are transferring or playing music from the Zen. I have no complaints about transfer speed with USB 2.0 using Notmad, but haven't used the webserver feature because it's not something I would use. The ability to shuffle all playlists in the software probably gives you a few hours extra on battery life as the hard drive on the Zen doesn't have to do that under it's own power and shuffling is known for using power.

The playlist backup to your hard drive is a nice feature as it only takes up a a few K's of space and therefore you can add and remove the playlists you have on the unit without too much fuss and time.

Bottom line is you won't be disappointed with Notmad if you already have it or are thinking about getting it. Creative came out with their own drag and drop explorer version, but it's rather featureless. It's been a no brainer for me using this software and after ease of use and convenience, I wouldn't be a happy camper if I had to go to mediasource. I remember originally installing mediasource, looking at it, saying screw that, and then uninstalling it so stick with Notmad and you won't have any regrets, but you will need your own MP3 ripper and burning software as it's not a part of Notmad.

LTM

 

[aroon]

sounds good. but as far as battery life it doesnt seem unaturally low then? i know the advertised battery life is generally higher than what most consumers actually see in the end but does the battery life seem FAR lower than what should be expected?

 

[callanish]

I'm going to say yes on battery life being lower in real world use than what is advertised, but it's all relative based on use.

If you use a 128 bit rate MP3, don't shuffle, EAX off, backlight off you'd hit 14 hours with non stop running on my NX. The Xtra might give you more battery life because of its 16MB buffer.

Most of my mp3's are 192 and above, I shuffle quite a bit and the EAX is off and I'm getting about 8 to 10 hours out of it. The one upside to the new NX/Xtra line is the replaceable battery. it's expensive at $50.00 for a battery, but since it doubles the battery time, it's always good to have a backup which is unique in the HD player world right now.

I remember doing nothing but shuffling with EAX on and I think it lasted closer to 6 hours, so take their optimistic battery stats with a grain of salt. I noticed it also took me about 10 charges to get maximum battery life out of it.

LTM

 

[aroon]

cool thanks a bunch. battery life seems to be still good so i think i might give notmad explorer a try after tinkering with the stock software for a while