ameyer17
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2005
- Posts
- 314
- Likes
- 10
Quote:
If I was worried about minimum potential for artifacts, I'd probably go with 320 kbps MP3 encoded by LAME for compatibility purposes.
High bitrate AAC/Ogg Vorbis/Musepack would be marginally less likely to have artifacts, but they also have less compatibility, especially with portable audio hardware.
On the other hand, it probably doesn't matter much with anything above about 192 kbps VBR, and I'm perfectly happy with -q.5 ("160 kbps VBR") Ogg Vorbis.
Originally Posted by thechungster /img/forum/go_quote.gif I would actually like to know the answer to this. Which is the best file format, that isn't lossless. At the moment I am using a mix of AAC, and MP3, both at rates of 200+kbps. Does it really matter that much? |
If I was worried about minimum potential for artifacts, I'd probably go with 320 kbps MP3 encoded by LAME for compatibility purposes.
High bitrate AAC/Ogg Vorbis/Musepack would be marginally less likely to have artifacts, but they also have less compatibility, especially with portable audio hardware.
On the other hand, it probably doesn't matter much with anything above about 192 kbps VBR, and I'm perfectly happy with -q.5 ("160 kbps VBR") Ogg Vorbis.