I was just kidding you. Keep calm and let"s personal rant between forums out of this. right ?
Heard the GSX mkII + HD800 ( meet conditions but good ones.. no ambient noise, very few people during our listenings, good quality time of listening, A/B against my own rig) and couldn't personaly live with that . Even for classical listening.
the result I heard was surprising for me in the sense that it was both beautiful and unlistenable. Beautiful cuz it's so clean, precise and vivid with a stellar black blackground. Unlistenable because the overall result is way too edgy and cold. Sounded like a radiography of the music. I already think the HD800 by itself proposes a kind of "enhanced" sound experience where everything is a bit overstated.. like 102% of the reality . Right ? with the gsx mkII it becomes 105% of the reality. that's too much for me and I found that really fatiguing, harsh. the friend who owns that combo ( with a HEGEL HD25 as DAC) loves that though. For me, GSX MKII + HD800 combo falls in the "too much of a good thing" category. Even for Classical and Stellar recording we tried.
What I wrote above is a pure Sorrodje's genuine opinion. I heard the HD800 from a bunch of other amps , including Meier's best offers that represent what I can call "neutral". I'm not in the camp who thinks the GSX mkII is "wire with gain" . No other amps I know are. I'm not in the camp of GSX mkII haters either. trust me or not
Considering you usual tastes, for me it looks like you're choosing the best option to hate the HD800 definitely
.. YMMV and let time will tell if you keep this 4th (5th? ) HD800.
PS : No opinion about the Bricasti, never heard it. But I'm convinced you'll do serious comparison with your totaldac with the HD800.