Mystery Unclosed [ Part II ] : Shure SRH-840 vs Audio Technica ATH-M50 vs Shure SRH-440 UPDATE: Klipsch Image One added 8/3/2013
Feb 27, 2013 at 7:26 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 10

BillsonChang007

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 21, 2012
Posts
5,956
Likes
438
Location
Johor, Malaysia
Hello all! A while ago, I started a thread comparing headphones that I had auditioned. Most headphones reviewed there are mostly above $200 except for the Shure SRH-840 which I added in for a quick comparison and it was a short one and the well known Ultimate Ears UE6000. Later on, after a few weeks, I felt silly for not comparing headphones under $200 but I was way too busy with all my stuff until now. 
 
First, I was supposed to add in these headphones under my old thread which is the part I of "Mystery Unclosed" but I find it might be too congested to add in too many headphones at one go and so, I started this one. Without any more talking, here we start:
 
Shure SRH-840:
 
Build Quality:
I don't appreciate much of the material here as it makes me feel the entire unit rather mediocre. Mostly made out of plastic. It feels like it will show some hairline cracks after sometime of rough usage. Please be noted that, I said rough usage. It shouldn't be a problem if you are very gentle with your gears. Other than the plastic build quality and exposed wire on the headband, I like most of the others.
 
Comfort:
Day and night in comparison to its little brother, SRH-440. The Shure SRH-840 have much proper padding on the headband, really comfortable and it's fairly thick. The earcups padding are much softer, thicker and really have a good sense of width! It covers my ear nicely. Like most of the pleather used with most headphones, it does get warm after a while. Also, my ears are touching the driver a little considering I have an L-size ears. 
 
Features:
For less than $150, it offers excellent features. First in the box, you get a 3.5mm to 6.5mm jack converter, detachable coiled cable and a soft carrying pouch. The carrying pouch is made of pleather and it protects your headphones while in the bag. The detachable cable is unfortunately coiled but you can always purchase a third party straight cable. From what I heard, it works with most cable but do search around before making a purchase or try the cable if possible, before making your payment. My favorite features out of all is the foldable design makes it really portable. Decent isolation but not great. 
 
Style:
The only part that I don't really care when I am choosing headphones but anyway, as these are meant for studio monitoring, the design look rather simple unlike those Ultimate Ears UE6000 or V-Modas. 
 
Sound Quality:
Before I get started, Shures are well known for their creamy mids and SRH-840 will not disappoint you in this regard! The mids are really nice clear, smooth, carrying some warm and decently detailed. Not completely analytical. Above mids are the high frequency. It is not at all overpowered, very sweet and neutral. Very clean sounding in between these two frequencies. The lows does disappoint me a little. There's a peak at the midbass causing slight hisses and ruins the clarity on mids and highs. The bass are slightly loose and does bleed a little. Soundstage are not too bad but at the same time, not excellent either. Slightly above average. Overall, it's very neutral and if possible, pairing with an amp would help! Last but not least, it is great if you are a midrange head and prefer a little bit of bass. Bear in mind, you can always turn down the bass to reduce hiss or straight forward, upgrade to the SRH-940 which I have yet to try. 
 
Audio Technica ATH-M50:
 
Build Quality:
Superb! Nothing to complain here. Really sturdy and it feels like it is really gonna last. It is made of plastic but here, it feels much more durable compared to Shure SRH-840. Definitely meant to last for years to come.
 
Comfort:
Not to mention, it is also much more comfortable in comparison to most closed headphones at it's price range. The entire paddings are made of pleather and the headband are very light and the earpads are really deep and my ears are not at all touching the driver. Excellent width too! Enough of space for ears to breathe but will still get warm after a while. I was told that the earpads get harden after some time, replacing it after a few years would be nice.
 
Features:
Nothing much. A carrying pouch, and a very foldable design. 
 
Style:
Yay and nay! The nice aluminium ring on the earcups look really nice and definitely bring out the style! However, it look weird when on the head. 
 
Sound Quality:
Some might like how it sound while some might not. The lows sound a little bloated to me. Does bleed a little to the mids. The mids are completely different from Shure SRH-840! It is recessed and lacks detail. Highs have some sparkle to me. Hisses are still there and it really lacks soundstage! I feel like all the entire music are closely packed together. If wider soundstage and better details are there, I would much appreciate it. For studio monitoring, I would much prefer Shure SRH-840 but for hip hop, rap and those kind of genre, I prefer these ATH-M50. No amp required to really shine and pairing with one does not help. 
 
Shure SRH-440:
 
Build Quality:
Not the best in this comparison to me. It is mostly made of plastic but for the given price, I still find it a bargain although the build quality isn't superb as it is speacialized in something else.
 
Comfort:
I do unfortunately, have comfort issue with these. The earpads are thin and stiff compared to SRH-840's. I feel like my ears are glued to the driver and it hurts after a while. There's no proper padding on the headband. Fortunately, I been seeing a lot of mods to fix comfot issue and I find it useful. In case you dislike DIY-ing, the SRH-840 earpads pair well with these and much comfortable. 
 
Features:
Shure treat these same to his elder brother. It packs with a handful of features; foldable design, detachable cable. 3.5mm to 6.5mm jack and a carrying pouch both are provided in the box. With all these features, I am less worried about the build quality. I dislike it when I have to replace the entire unit just because the cable are broke. 
 
Style:
Ones again, these are meant for studio monitoring. It does look good to me but keep in mind that, I have bad eye for fashion. Never did I get qualified to have a good eye for fashion. XD
 
Sound Quality:
These really blows my mind. Literally. There's a slight roll off at the lows. It is lacking some quantity but there's really something in terms of quality! It is well controlled and does not bleed at all. The mids carry some warm, very smooth and creamy. The highs are slightly "sharp" to me. Overall, it is very neutral and sound fairly similar to SRH-840 at some aspect. Excellent for studio monitoring. Soundstage are average and the details are above average. Music instruments are very nicely presented, good sense of separation. I must say, these does brings some veiled sound.
 
Klipsch Image One:
 
Build Quality:
Mostly made out of thick plastic coated with rubbery feel. I am not certain if the earcups housing are made of pleather or real leather but it feels nice to me. The hinge might feels a little fragile. Cables are decently made and the mic and control looks very stylish.
 
Comfort:
Not superb. I don't think I could stand wearing it for more than 30 minutes but that's because of my large ears and sweats easily. The overall weight are light. Very lightweight to me compared to V-Modas.
 
Features:
Nothing much but best if you are planing to use these for portable. It really does it's job well here. It folds flat, a carrying case and last but not least, the cables are tangle free. Unfortunately, it lacks the last bit of single sided cable. For the price, I would much appriciate it if it come with a single sides cable and there goes the second version of it. A single sided cable and a little bit more comfortable earpads.
 
style:
Even if I closed my eyes, I would still say these look classy. XD
 
Sound Quality:
Comparable to the popular ATH-M50. It serve a rather V-Shape sound. Bass at times might be overwhelmed, bloated and uncontrolled. A good EQ turning down the mid bass would be nice. Mids are recessed but the upper mids are awesome. Very clear, excellent with female vocals. Highs are crystal clear. Soundstage are decent. Details on the other hand are good. Overall, I prefer these over ATH-M50 in terms of sound quality.
 
Comparison:
 
Build Quality:
Audio Technica ATH-M50 > Klipsch Image One > Shure SRH-840 > Shure SRH-440
 
The reason for this result because, the Shure's exposed cables feels fragile.
 
Comfort:
Audio Technica ATH-M50 > Shure SRH-840 > Shure SRH-440 > Klipsch Image One
 
Features:
Klipsch Image One > Shure SRH-840 > Shure SRH-440 >  Audio Technica ATH-M50
 
Style:
Klipsch Image One > Audio Technica ATH-M50 > Shure SRH-840 = Shure SRH-440
 
Sound Quality:
Shure SRH-840 > Klipsch Image One > Audio Technica ATH-M50 ? Shure SRH-440 
 
*ATH-M50 and SRH-440 are of different animals and targeted for different consumers. The ATH-M50 has a rather V-shape sound/fun sound signature while the SRH-440 are of a neutral headphone and it lacks bass slam compared to ATH-M50
 
Hope this help narrowing your decision! If you have different opinion than mini, I would love to read it below! Thanks! 
 
Sorry for late update, was pretty busy past few days...
 
NOTE: More comparison are coming really soon. Will be adding in more headphones later on. As for now, this is all I am going to share as I am in a rush xD See you soon and I hope this help! 
 
Cheers! 
size]

 
Feb 27, 2013 at 7:40 AM Post #2 of 10
Quote:
 
Comparison:
 
Build Quality:
Audio Technica ATH-M50 > Shure SRH-840
 
Comfort:
Audio Technica ATH-M50 > Shure SRH-840
 
Features:
Shure SRH-840 > Audio Technica ATH-M50
 
Style:
Audio Technica ATH-M50 > Shure SRH-840
 
Sound Quality:
Shure SRH-840 > Audio Technica ATH-M50
 
 
NOTE: More comparison are coming really soon. Will be adding in more headphones later on. As for now, this is all I am going to share as I am in a rush xD See you soon and I hope this help!
 
Cheers! 
size]

I pretty much agree, although I find the 840 more comfortable than the M50.
 
Feb 28, 2013 at 1:39 AM Post #6 of 10
Despite what people say, the M50's soundstage increases in size slightly with a good computer DAC.
Same with the level of detail. I used the HRT MSII, but even an ODAC would be an improvement.
 
Portable devices always limit soundstage size IMO.
 
I always liked the SRH-840, but side-graded to the M50 due to comfort issues. Eventually I found the DJ100.
 
If you like the SRH-840, the K240 Studio has a near identical frequency graph. I never A/B compared them though.
 
I bet you could reduce the 840's mid-bass hump with SRH-940 pads.
 
Feb 12, 2014 at 4:41 PM Post #10 of 10
I own a pair of SRH-440 (will keep refering to them as "440's"), and have done so for more than 5 years. I have them consistently plugged to a Juli@ soundcard, with the exception of when I'm using my GT-10 to make some sweet tunes. I agree they turn uncomfy after 2h of consistent use - you will get red rings on your ears. However, that's about as much as I'm willing to agree with anything said about them. Which is why I'm going to give my perspective on how it is to actually live with them on a daily basis. First things first - they have had some leather shedding on the bows and cups - not that anyone sees it except me whenever I'm removing them. But that's the only cosmetic damage. And I have been using them basicly 6h a day for 5 years. The exposed wires and plastic body have never been an issue. You might think that the wires will get caught and the plastic will crack - nuhuh - not the case, not even closely. The soundquality. I know you put ? at it but - come on - I use it for recording guitar, piano, drums, listening to techno and all sorts of punk, pop and rock. NEVER do I get tired and think of getting a new pair of phones. And I think that's because the width with which the treeble and bass dynamicly works together gives it a distinct clean and natural tone. You notice the lack of bass when changing for let's say any of Sony's likeworthy phones - but after using the more "bassy" phones - you will come to cherish the cleam simple sound of the 440's. Because the tone feels natural you gain a more whole sound. They are therefore invaluable to me when soundediting because they produce very rich mids and distinct lows and have a dynamic treeble - giving away any changes in the high and lows. This doesn't mean I say "flat" and only usable for musicmaking. Give them some good hardware and their capabilities as musicphones won't dissapoint. My next phones most certainly will be the SRH840 since I actually feel that the SRH840 is the 440's larger cousin on steroids - it just brings more of the goodstuff in the 440's. Shure packs every phone with smart accessories, and the 840 have even more changeable parts making it a bargain of the year. 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top