mako44
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2012
- Posts
- 159
- Likes
- 10
I listen to carefully different musics for this morning here's an information that can be useful : I much prefered the sound of the 2c51 Ericsson tube instead of the others (jw 3w96a, ge 5 star 6386) but were always disapointed because it was too thin/lean on mids and sometimes too bright on some recordings making it less magical than the other tubes despite of better clarity, details, soundstage and so on...
For I put the K-chips it's "wonderful" (for what they can do, many things can still be improved). It doesn't sound too thin or lean anymore but very well balanced compared to the bass and highs. Highs are not harsh or too bright anymore, once again all is very good i'm impressed as I didn't expect that. So I don't exactly know if the k chips are fuller in the mids or just duller than the L ones but it's a really good combination with the 2c51 ericsson tube : in fact for those who use or liked this tube despite the defaults I explained before, k-chips + 2c51 is a must have, really.
For I put the K-chips it's "wonderful" (for what they can do, many things can still be improved). It doesn't sound too thin or lean anymore but very well balanced compared to the bass and highs. Highs are not harsh or too bright anymore, once again all is very good i'm impressed as I didn't expect that. So I don't exactly know if the k chips are fuller in the mids or just duller than the L ones but it's a really good combination with the 2c51 ericsson tube : in fact for those who use or liked this tube despite the defaults I explained before, k-chips + 2c51 is a must have, really.