bagwell359
Headphoneus Supremus
I am in no way affiliated with MD, but I do have an opinion...
At what point is a collaboration product so close to (or otherwise competes with) what the partner already sells that this out and out takes higher profit margin sales away?
In the end the real magic/trick of the MD x collaborations is that they add extra sales at lower price and cost points without significantly taking sales from mainline products. Thus they ressurect good but older designs (e.g. Ether CX, the Koss estats) or "dumb down" cosmetic features and/or functionality just a bit (these?), or both, to reduce the competition with the partner products. It isn't just about saving $16... It is about adding ***additional*** sales and profit for MD and the partner. Oh, and it ain't bad marketing for the rest of the partner's product line.
In return those of us who are not in the market for the higher priced offerings still get very good deals on still very good technology, and give up a few things for the reduced price. And those interested in, and able to afford, the top of the line won't likely be tempted by these. Win-win for everyone.
Just don't ask for those collaboration products to resemble too closely the higher cost models. Then the collaboration biz model breaks.
Just my opinion.
The HFM 4XX has a better headband than any HFM model, and it sounds fine. Senn has the 58X, 6** very similar to the stock models, and all 3 are still active products (although the 650 might get fazed out I understand).
The HFM is a special case IMO as the headbands have been hammered by customers. I don't care that they just include one cable. I'm sure the box is a box with nothing special in it. The pads look stock which is important since finding that shape after market isn't very likely (yet).
I'm not per say against what you are saying, but, that headband is an eyesore, and it doesn't look very comfortable in the stock pics, if it is actually uncomfortable or doesn't keep the cups properly on ones head - than it is indeed a choice of money saved over actual function. If that's so (and obviously I don't know) it's not good. I predict that the reviewers will pick at them, and that it will be a negative factor in buyers choice in many cases.