Funny you say that. I just sent my Ragnarok back to Schiit today because I wasn't wow'd by the product pairing with the 800S (I'm still within my 15 day return window).
And honestly, I could not tell much of a difference between the $1600 Ragnarok and my good ol' $250 O2 amp/dac. I'm starting to believe that solid states do not really change much to the musicality after a certain price point. Hence, why I am here scouting tube amps.
I'm just about ready to pull the trigger on the 339 from shenzhen but I kinda want to lurk here more for opinions. Has anyone compared the 339 to other tube products with the 800S or the 650?
Don't tube amps have potential to change sound in a distinctly different manner than solid state? Isn't the Ragnarok being compared to tube kind of like comparing apples and oranges?
I didn't notice much of a difference between the solid state O2 and the solid state Ragnarok, but is the perceived difference between those two in any way contraindicative of hearing a difference between O2 and 339?
@tkddans The Rag is powerful, detailed and musical with both 800S and HEK. It's a pity that it didnt work out for you. If I have only 1 amp, it will be the Rag as it is transparent i.e. does not add or subtract from the source. I get more bass from HEK because it is the more bassy headphone compared to 800S. It is also versatile with the balanced out and speaker out.
339 performance is very dependent on the tubes. For the combo of tubes in my 339 right now, 800S bass performance is good. Sound is not warm at all, it's neutral - like the Rag. For the stock tubes that come with 339, you may or may not hear the difference between O2/339 given that you didnt for O2/Rag.