NRGz28
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2011
- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 11
T
I just got some DJ100's at best buy yesterday. I also have the MT50's and have been throurougly enjoying them for the last couple months. To ME, the MT50's sound way better overall. The base is nice, tight and accurate... the DJ100's are definitely lacking in that. The highs are also a lot more pronounced on the MT50's. To ME,, the DJ100's sound like a cheaper,. generic headphone. No bass, no highs, but LOTS of mids. The reason I got them is for my wife. She doesnt care about all that, but she does like the fact that they're lighter and somewhat more confy to wear over long periods of time. If I were to compare the sound of the DJ100... they sound like the Denon 1001's I tried a couple weeks back. Bottom line is.. the MT50s are better headphones all around and WELL worth they price. The DJ100's are for mid lovers.. and I'm not one of those people Sound isolation is also much better with the MT50s.
I just got some DJ100's at best buy yesterday. I also have the MT50's and have been throurougly enjoying them for the last couple months. To ME, the MT50's sound way better overall. The base is nice, tight and accurate... the DJ100's are definitely lacking in that. The highs are also a lot more pronounced on the MT50's. To ME,, the DJ100's sound like a cheaper,. generic headphone. No bass, no highs, but LOTS of mids. The reason I got them is for my wife. She doesnt care about all that, but she does like the fact that they're lighter and somewhat more confy to wear over long periods of time. If I were to compare the sound of the DJ100... they sound like the Denon 1001's I tried a couple weeks back. Bottom line is.. the MT50s are better headphones all around and WELL worth they price. The DJ100's are for mid lovers.. and I'm not one of those people Sound isolation is also much better with the MT50s.