carltonh
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2013
- Posts
- 397
- Likes
- 94
I'll keep this short. I love the sound of the Sony MH1. (I have a short converter to make it work like a MH1C.) But I HATE HATE HATE the comfort and design. However, I think the Jlab Epic has 100% of the sound, same EQ, quality of tightness, deep subbass and impact, and clarity, but 10x the comfort. I don't tolerate the Sony MH1 unless I'm sitting still. The Jlab Epic I enjoy for miles and miles of jogging.
Now they use "cush fins" which so far, to me, are a gimmick, unnecessary, but not bad, as the design is perfectly comfortable. I also have not figured out what their C3 (TM) is supposed to be. It just seems like a bad marketing trademarked phrase.
So I'm interested to see if another audiophile, or at least one who appreciates the sonic EQ of the Sony MH1 or MH1C will appreciate the Jlab Epic as a similar sound but with drastically improved ergonomics.
Another similar sound IEM is the Philips SHE5105. I also dislike it for its discomfort, but appreciate it as equal to the MH1 but a slightly more comfortable design, but still too uncomfortable. All 3 represent an improvement to the cheap SHE3580, but only the Jlab Epic is IMO, a drastic improvement to comfort.
Now they use "cush fins" which so far, to me, are a gimmick, unnecessary, but not bad, as the design is perfectly comfortable. I also have not figured out what their C3 (TM) is supposed to be. It just seems like a bad marketing trademarked phrase.
So I'm interested to see if another audiophile, or at least one who appreciates the sonic EQ of the Sony MH1 or MH1C will appreciate the Jlab Epic as a similar sound but with drastically improved ergonomics.
Another similar sound IEM is the Philips SHE5105. I also dislike it for its discomfort, but appreciate it as equal to the MH1 but a slightly more comfortable design, but still too uncomfortable. All 3 represent an improvement to the cheap SHE3580, but only the Jlab Epic is IMO, a drastic improvement to comfort.