[Kuze]

Trying to pass an interview to get into music site, but i failed the first time, tell me where i went wrong, thanks.

 

[krmathis]

1. No. Lossy to lossy is bad.
2. Yes. Lossless to lossless should be fine.
3. No. See #1.
4. Yes. Lossless to lossy should be fine.
5. No. Lossy to lossless is really bad.
6. No. See #1.
7. No. See #1.
8. No. See #5.
9. Yes. See #2.
10. Yes. See #4.
11. No. See #5.
12. No. See #1.
13. Yes. See #2 and #4.
14. No. See #1.
15. No. See #1.

Seems like you failed miserably!

 

[Cianyx]

Should have answered all "No"

 

[EnOYiN]

Quote:

Originally Posted by krmathis /img/forum/go_quote.gif 14. No. See #1.

This is lossless to lossless to lossless to lossy. So it should be fine for as far as music quality goes. I don't know about the requirements of what.cd though. You might have to own the original source.

Edit: Talking about such 'music sites' is not allowed on Head-Fi by the way. Just FYI.

 

[terrymx]

I hope they get shut down just like oink. Can you imagine a bunch of obnoxious half-lifes kid with an extra sense of elitism because they belongs to the place.

 

[krmathis]

Quote:

Originally Posted by EnOYiN /img/forum/go_quote.gif This is lossless to lossless to lossless to lossy. So it should be fine for as far as music quality goes. I don't know about the requirements of what.cd though. You might have to own the original source.

You are right. Guess I mixed up...
Not used to see reference to APE, as Monkey's Audio is the real name.

 

[Kuze]

You know what was going through my mind was the quality and not the transcode rule, how could i mess that up,
lossy -> lossy = no
thanks anyways.