I have been checking their site about everyday looking to see if the info on the T3D was updated and it looks like it had been added to the product list.
Originally Posted by Pangaea /img/forum/go_quote.gif Didn't somebody post that per iBasso, the original T3 was actually the better amp?
Yep they sent me an email last week saying the that T3 had slightly better sound than the T3D. stumped if i know y though. they didn't give any specifics
I doubt that the differences are major, but it begs the question : why build the T3D if it wasnt an improvement. I have had no problem controlling levels with the T3 - its not like some desktops where a single volume increment can take output from 'too soft' to too loud.
I have digital volume control on my MD-10, but I've yet to detect any improvement over the analog control on the Topaz. I'm sure iBasso have their reasons - it may simply be that the digital control fits better in the slimline casing for the T3.
Originally Posted by estreeter /img/forum/go_quote.gif I doubt that the differences are major, but it begs the question : why build the T3D if it wasnt an improvement. I have had no problem controlling levels with the T3 - its not like some desktops where a single volume increment can take output from 'too soft' to too loud.
I have digital volume control on my MD-10, but I've yet to detect any improvement over the analog control on the Topaz. I'm sure iBasso have their reasons - it may simply be that the digital control fits better in the slimline casing for the T3.
Very likely a marketing decision by iBasso, as some folks perceive that anything "digital" is better. It also allows for direct competition and comparisons with the Shadow.
Digital is better, if implemented right. It depends on how many steps the digital control has. You can get hundreds of steps with digital, making the sound just perfect for those highly sensitive IEMs.
I'm feeding a pair of ATH-50's with this (pending) purchase and primarily use it while traveling. I wonder if the difference in SQ / functionality is really "that" different between the two or if it is just a matter of preference? I would prefer the T3 style volume control (rotary vs. dig. "toggle") as I think it is easier to manipulate, in-flight.
Anyone know of any tests / trial runs that are available or in progress with the T3D yet - I'm leaning toward the T3 right now and adding a Quables Performance SE LOD to tie them together. Either way, I'm pretty sure that I can't lose...
If you arent happy with your T3(D) after 8-10 hours burn-in, send it back - this isnt an amp that needs a lot of hours to sound good. That said, I havent seen any posts from anyone who returned theirs because they were unhappy - I have to wonder if some went with the D4 over the T3, but thats understandable.
Just received my T3D. I was surprised by it's size.
About the Digital volume control. I think it implemented much much better than Fiio E5 (of course it's almost 5 times the price). It divided the control into tiny step so you can have a precise control of volume. When I use the E5, I can never have the prefered volume so I give up using the LOD.
T3D will set the volume to the default (nearly silence) when you restart the amp.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
