Skylab
Reviewerus Prolificus
Quote:
Quote:
I agree that the HE-5 are simply a good performer in their price range. I actually think, in general, the discussion of the HE-5 has not been over-hyped - they sound very good, definitely not perfect, and most owners had discussed their good AND bad points.
I like the HE-5 quite a bit - but I'm not selling my DX1000's anytime soon, or any of my Beyers, for that matter, although the HE-5 are getting almost all the "at-work" head-time at the moment (the only place I can really use open headphones is at work). Very solid performers, very attractively priced, and like most headphones, sufficiently idiosyncratic that they will appeal greatly to some, and not as much to others. Nothing more, nothing less.
Originally Posted by Bullseye /img/forum/go_quote.gif I can smell a lot of hype in this thread (people ditching electrostatic systems just for this, etc...). I have seen this thing been done before, and it doesn't amuse me this HE-5 headphones will just be another competent headphone which some will love others won't find so special. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by somestranger26 /img/forum/go_quote.gif True about the hype, lots of FotMs on here. However, one thing is for certain -- they fall into the correct price range for their performance. |
I agree that the HE-5 are simply a good performer in their price range. I actually think, in general, the discussion of the HE-5 has not been over-hyped - they sound very good, definitely not perfect, and most owners had discussed their good AND bad points.
I like the HE-5 quite a bit - but I'm not selling my DX1000's anytime soon, or any of my Beyers, for that matter, although the HE-5 are getting almost all the "at-work" head-time at the moment (the only place I can really use open headphones is at work). Very solid performers, very attractively priced, and like most headphones, sufficiently idiosyncratic that they will appeal greatly to some, and not as much to others. Nothing more, nothing less.