Quote:
I think you are the only one I have ever heard describe them as neutral. I have always heard a bit bright at the high end and punchy at the low. I was looking at the Beyers because I was looking for something a bit more exciting. The HD 595s are pretty neutral, but not exactly the most fun.
Quote:
Oh really? I was not aware of that...good to know. If that's the case, I think you would be very happy going with the Beyers, especially if what you are looking for is a fairly neutral sound signature.
Sorry, I"m probably describing it terribly. I think that the Beyers have a neutral frequency response, but still maintain a lively sound (I hope that is a little clearer). They aren't bloated in the lows, mids, or highs, but rather provide a very clean and balanced mix of the three. As far as the U-response curve (bright at the highs and punchy at the lows), that becomes more and more apparent as you go deeper into the DT line (770 vs. 880 vs. 990). The 770 is going to have the flattest response out of the three and I really like the sound that it has.
I listened to a friend's HD 595's, and while they had an absolutely beautiful sound, they lacked a lot of bass (in my opinion), which is why I personally tend to not go for Sennheiser. The Beyers definitely have a lively sound, the "neutrality" I was referring to was more along the lines of the non-bloatedness of specific frequency responses, if that makes any sense.