OmenWalker
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2011
- Posts
- 68
- Likes
- 10
Quote:
Wait what?
How comes!?
I swear both of them were making enough money?
I don't know the details,but there was some kind of dispute between the two.Now monster has focused on releasing all new headphone models which look like **** to me.Some of them look like you need a matching outfit to make the headphones look good...
Quote:
> Science can hold many assertions in regards to facts and such..but it doesn't always cover every single aspect. Going back to headphones here, this could be analogous to the whole lower and sub-sonic frequencies. As stated before, human hearing is within the 20hz-20KHZ frequency.. correct? Yet, sound engineers, audiophiles, professional musicians attest and swear that while the science may hold truth, adding the sub frequency notes actually adds to the whole spectrum of sound; somehow makes it fuller, better and more real and 3 dimensional sounding. And this isn't me stating this, this is a wide consensus... Is that Placebo as-well?
Shotor's anti-science sentiments just don't work. Honestly I find it offensive when people who know nothing about what they're saying (like Shotor who "is going to be a psychologist"... but presumably isn't yet) put down science saying things like "Science doesn't know the answer!" I used to say the same thing, until I actually learned what I was talking about and realized how ignorant what I was saying was.
You can say science doesn't know everything, in the sense that there are unanswered questions, but that's very different from saying science doesn't know what it claims to know.
On the matter of 20hz-20khz, there are absolutely scientific reasons why frequencies outside this range can contribute to the sound perceptible by humans even though the general hearing range is smaller (at least for the general population). However such explanations involve math and/or science, and anyone here who knows enough of it probably doesn't need to have it explained anyway.
Anyway on the topic of placebo, if you think you can tell when it's working on you or not, then I don't think you know what placebo is. By definition, placebo seems indistinguishable from reality. In fact, placebo works even if you KNOW at the time that what you are experiencing is placebo. It's like in the cartoons when the character runs off the cliff and hovers mid-air, until they realize that's not supposed to happen and then fall down -- with placebo when you realize you're hovering in mid-air, you still won't fall down.
While I agree saying "Science doesn't know what it claims to know" is a daring and most times @sshole-ish thing to say,it can be true sometimes.
Like how Newton had his three laws but Einstein disproved them(granted they are still true,but only under set conditions) or how Einstein stated nothing could move faster than the speed of light but modern scientist managed to disprove that too(don't know the details on that though).
Well,what I'm saying is,sometimes science doesn't know what it thinks it does cuz humans are involved,and we make mistakes.
On the 20hz-20khz thing,you're absolutely right.This range may be a human's audible hearing range but that doesn't mean the other frequencies outside this range can't be felt right?
Can't remember when I knew I was under the placebo effect though.. :\