swbf2cheater
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2009
- Posts
- 5,044
- Likes
- 121
We need to start paying ClieOS some type of fee for having to answer 26 pages worth of questions
We need to start paying ClieOS some type of fee for having to answer 26 pages worth of questions
Given that I only use full sized headphones, IEMs are not a good reference. And not being able to use it while charging is another thing I dislike. So far, the battery charge and the charging thing are two things that might be a dealbreaker. I might end up just getting the E9 and be done with it. The current battery charge just isn't enough for me, and I'm willing to sacrifice somewhat of an improvement over PA2V2 SQ for a much longer lasting battery and a pleasant sound as well.
BTW, does E11 have a SNR of 98dB or is it higher? The specs seem to be unclear on that.
We need to start paying ClieOS some type of fee for having to answer 26 pages worth of questions
After many months at the bottom of a drawer, I resurrected my T3 yesterday courtesy of a $20 universal AC adapter. I largely abandoned the little guy the day I bought the D4, and that was a mistake. I agree that its darker - appreciably more so than the D4 or P4 - but what blows me away is the bass response for such a tiny amp. I literally cannot wait for my RE262s to get here - will pass on the E11 based on ClieOS' later impressions. I had 'cold and detailed' with the RE0 and it just wasnt for me, but I do agree that for $60 anything which is on the same level as the T3 is an achievement.
I see. Would the M50 or the Ultrasone 580/2200 be worth amping tho? Would the E11 make any difference besides the added bass boost?
It is not just size of the transducer, but also impedance and sensitivity. A 12ohm IEM can be more demanding current wise than a 64 ohm full sized; a 95dB will need a lot more volume than a 106dB. But for what it worths, unless we are talking about >150ohm and <98dB or <12ohm, I really doubt the battery life will be very by much. I never listen to PA2V2 before so I can't really tell you if teh SQ improvement will worth over the battery life or not.
SNR is listed as equal or better than 98dB. I am not sure how correct it is since I don't have anything to measure it,.
Thanks for the insight! Ok I got one more question for you. Since I am an EE major and have just started my summer break I wanted to build an CMoy tangentsoft version. Maybe not so much for improving the SQ or anything or saving money but just for a small project in my free time to gain some hands-on experience, or to be able to say I did it etc.
My question is, what op amp i should use and (even if it is an absurd comparision), what is that DIY CMoy compared to the E11? Since, like you said, the M50 is not difficult to drive and the fact that I just want some additional bass boost, makes me wonder if the E11 would totally trash the CMoy in every aspect incl. the bass boost aspect?
Thank you
Dual1ty,
the E11 is a ground buffered design. Three channel topology where (according to sources) The ground channel is powered by the OPA690, and the Left and Right channels are powered by the AD8397. that gives better slew rate. the CMoy on the other hand is not based on a three channel topology, so i really dont think that it would compete with the E11. another variant of the CMoy, the Cmoy2, found on sgheadphones, is ground buffered, and "Can" compete solely on SQ. another diy amp u could try is the Mini^3, running on the same AD8397 and the OPA690, which i am also building right now, and that can, in my opinion, a competent amp for the E11.
Edit: for more questions, i guess u should open a new thread, not hacking this one dedicated to the E11.
Micca shipped mine today
I have no idea where they are located, but if they are east coast there is a chance I will receive it tomorrow.
Guys,
E11 related update here:
http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/554035/shipment-of-e11-updated-may-19/30#post_7488718
Jack