[Bastianpp]

i neeeeeeeeed reviewsss !!

 

[Cecala]

 

Late to the party.
http://www.head-fi.org/t/791531/dx200-details-of-design-features-and-specifications-on-1st-page-updated-12-17-2016/2385#post_13168667

 

[stenog]

Pretty quiet on the east front . Are everyone enjoying the DX200.

 

[Rockcoon]

Pretty quiet on the east front . Are everyone enjoying the DX200.

The situation reminds me this:
"Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself"

 

[tin427]

The situation reminds me this:
"Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself"

You really need to listen to understand how magical this device is

 

[CracKinGDucK]

From what i learn and my own experience, you really need to give time for your piece to warm up for 20-50 hours.

 

[icefalkon]

  From what i learn and my own experience, you really need to give time for your piece to warm up for 20-50 hours.

 
Just about every high end device I've owned has needed way more than that....I'm talking in the range of 100+ to fully burn in. But that's just my own experience. 
 
Steve from NYC

 

[GREYH0UND]

Can you connect this with a pc and use it as a dac?

 

[CracKinGDucK]

Can you connect this with a pc and use it as a dac?

yes, with the driver it provided

Mimouille also suggested there is no lag even it is used to play a video in pc.

 

[WCDchee]

You really need to listen to understand how magical this device is

Managed the mojo comparison yet?

 

[koluludome]

Exited to hear some after some burn in impression *0*

 

[tin427]

Managed the mojo comparison yet?

Just a brief comparison.
Low: They have the same level of bass presence, DX200 is a bit tighter and cleaner.
Mid: Mojo have a closer vocal imaging and a bit warm compare to DX200. 
High: Mojo's high is smoother than DX200 so it is more forgiving than DX200. 
Soundstage: DX200 has a round soundstage while Mojo has a elliptical soundstage. DX200 have a much better depth in sound stage but the width is just a bit wider than Mojo.
Details: DX200 is a detail monster. It have even more details than mojo.
 
Overall: Mojo has a more musical sound. I like the way that mojo presented the vocal when I listen to some jazz and blues.
DX200 is definitely an all rounder just with a little laid back vocal.(compare to mojo)
Sometime there will be sibilance (Never happened on Mojo) on poor record.
But it sure can handle all kinds of music. You can just sit back and listen for hours.
 
The above impression is by DX90 transport to mojo/ DX200(~60 Hours burn in) balanced/Single end out with Noble K10.
Sorry for my poor English

  

 

[NaiveSound]

Is the firmware up to par on this? Or does it take a year to get fixed like dx80 and a few other Daps (ibasso) did?

They just need to hire Lurker0, he gets the job done right

 

[chaiyuta]

Does DX200 support microSD card with "exFat" Format? I own a sandisk 128gb and it can be formated only "exFat" or "NTFS" format via Windows 10 64 bit.

 

[Dephezz]

I wish someone could compare plain DX80 with DX200 in order to determine if the upgrade is really substantial. For instance, what about overall sounds density/sturdiness and quantity of mid/upper bass range? Does DX200 make dynamic music, like EDM n trip-hop, perceived in the right expressive way (pace)? I mean do you 'feel' it? Does it force you to tap because of sound signature, not due to your favorite track? DX80 does it, notwithstanding its weaknesses. 
Thanks in advance!