Can the Xonar U3 drive headphones which have serious sub bass?
May 9, 2013 at 4:51 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 7

dakanao

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Posts
3,112
Likes
440
Because the frequency response of the U3 is 20 hz - 20.000 khz, and the M Audio Q40's can do some serious sub bass, which even can be heard at 10 hz. So since it's lower than the frequency response of the U3, will it be able to drive it well?
 
May 9, 2013 at 7:03 AM Post #2 of 7
The frequency response specs of most headphones can generally be ignored, since it is not known how (if at all) they were measured, and the +/- dB tolerance for the range is not specified either. So, the manufacturer can basically make up whatever numbers it wants for marketing purposes. The frequency response of the Xonar might only be specified for 20-20000 Hz, but that does not mean that it will not be able to reproduce 19 or 20001 Hz. In fact, it is very likely that in practice the headphone will be the limiting factor.
The main limitations of the headphone output of the Xonar U3 are its relatively high output impedance, and low maximum current output (it uses an IC designed for use as a line output buffer, rather than driving headphones). Still, most of the distortion and frequency response error will probably come from the Q40, except perhaps at high frequencies the "headphone amplifier" in the Xonar may distort more than some headphones.
 
May 9, 2013 at 7:06 AM Post #3 of 7
Quote:
The frequency response specs of most headphones can generally be ignored, since it is not known how (if at all) they were measured, and the +/- dB tolerance for the range is not specified either. So, the manufacturer can basically make up whatever numbers it wants for marketing purposes. The frequency response of the Xonar might only be specified for 20-20000 Hz, but that does not mean that it will not be able to reproduce 19 or 20001 Hz. In fact, it is very likely that in practice the headphone will be the limiting factor.
The main limitations of the headphone output of the Xonar U3 are its relatively high output impedance, and low maximum current output (it uses an IC designed for use as a line output buffer, rather than driving headphones). Still, most of the distortion and frequency response error will probably come from the Q40, except perhaps at high frequencies the "headphone amplifier" in the Xonar may distort more than some headphones.

So do you know any better headphone amplifiers with the same price for the laptop?
 
May 9, 2013 at 7:25 AM Post #4 of 7
Since the Q40 has relatively high impedance but good efficiency, it will work reasonably well with the U3. At the same price, the X-Fi Go could be an alternative, but it would not really be much of an improvement overall.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top