grawk
Itinerant Miscreant
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Posts
- 8,739
- Likes
- 38
The problem being that the switcher will impact the signal as well. Blind tests aren't easy to do transparently when it comes to signal impact...
Originally Posted by grawk The problem being that the switcher will impact the signal as well. |
Originally Posted by some1x http://stefanaudioart.com/EquinoxHD590.html ($95 for 4-ft cable, 30 day guarantee) http://www.headphile.com/page17.html ($60 for 3.3-ft cable, 15 day guarantee, check bottom of page for HD590 cable) |
Originally Posted by bigshot Which one of these will make my cans sound more "better"? See ya Steve |
Originally Posted by backdrifter Akuan, you have no idea how much I'd like to be in your camp. I really tried to believe they were all the same, whether Senn replacement cables, IC's, or toslinks. You have no idea what a tightwad I am. It's just my ears, man, they won't let me be content with the cheap stuff. I really wish someone would come out with a dirt cheap cable that would put all the rest to shame. |
Originally Posted by Glod Every time I am confronted with how much I have spent on gear I nevertheless sleep well that night. The reason is that I have been tested several times by my own forgetful mind a) Bought IC cable X - was convinced I had connected it (but hadn't) - listen to it the next day and got disappointed I could not hear any difference to the old cable Y. b) Had connected an old $50 IC I have had for years, because the favourite IC was needed for another application upstairs. Sat down some days later and got increasingly aware of that something was not as it use to be. "The soundstage is compressed One can always argue that I subconsciously was aware of the change of cables. I am open to that but do not consider it as likely. A related scenario is listening at night. IME it happens here frequently that the sound all of a sudden improves; gets "blacker" and with better soundstage. First I though it was me, entering a sub-awareness deam world, laying there in the sofa |
Originally Posted by taymat Soundstage is the most psychoacoustic observation of music you can detect with your ears, apart from emotion IMO. Therefore saying there was a slightly compressed soundstage, when you subconsciously think there should be a difference, is full of holes. Also I get the same feeling as you later at night or when the house is empty, the music sounds better with blacker blacks (a stupid expression, black can only be black else it's grey!). My observations when I've had the house to myself have been an improvement in percieved detail. Why? I'm assuming because my brain isn't having to filter out noticeable background noise and I'm concentrating more on the music. IMO if you're more aware of yourself, you're more aware of your senses. However I don't live in your house or apartment. You could live in the middle of nowhere, or in the middle of a city, where electrical interference is more common and the effects upon audio equipment may be audible. |
Originally Posted by Glod Every time I am confronted with how much I have spent on gear I nevertheless sleep well that night. The reason is that I have been tested several times by my own forgetful mind a) Bought IC cable X - was convinced I had connected it (but hadn't) - listen to it the next day and got disappointed I could not hear any difference to the old cable Y. b) Had connected an old $50 IC I have had for years, because the favourite IC was needed for another application upstairs. Sat down some days later and got increasingly aware of that something was not as it use to be. "The soundstage is compressed One can always argue that I subconsciously was aware of the change of cables. I am open to that but do not consider it as likely. A related scenario is listening at night. IME it happens here frequently that the sound all of a sudden improves; gets "blacker" and with better soundstage. First I though it was me, entering a sub-awareness deam world, laying there in the sofa |
Originally Posted by eastside504 Thanks for YOUR FACTS Fact - some people can hear a difference, others cant Fact - some system will produce a difference, others cant Is there a diffence between 87 or 89 octane gas? Well if i had a 100hp car, then there wont be a difference. If i put that gas into a 300 hp car, well then there will be a difference. Difference system will be able to show minute differences. A lower system (100hp car) will not show a difference, while a higher system (300hp car) will. Now if i took the 300hp car to a 1/4 mile track and ran it with 87 and then 89 octane will i see a difference? Most likely not. But if i had John Force drive the 1/4 mile will there be a difference? Most likely. Why? Because John Force can drive the car better then me, ie he is able to do something that i cant (different ppl will have difference in hearing). I know its a crappy analogy but i'm trying to get people to understand MY facts. |