drarthurwells
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2005
- Posts
- 2,604
- Likes
- 15
First impressions on the Audeze LCD-3 (made in May 2016) received today, as used with the
Bada PH12 amp (stock, not yet modified) and Eastsound E5 Platinum Reference Edition CD player.
I have stuck with my Sennheiser HD600 with Cardas cable for many years now, and recently bought the LCD-3.
I was afraid of buying the LCD-4 because of reports from some of difficulty to drive them and because I wasn't sure the extra cost was justified in terms of the degree of better sound.
The first thing I noticed was that the Bada PH12 amp had more than enough power to drive the LCD-3, and perhaps even do better power-wise than with the HD600. My first thought was that I should have gotten the LCD-4 which the Bada could have easily driven.
At first listen for a few minutes, the differences between the HD600 and LCD-3 seemed slight but after a few minutes I started to notice the quality improvement with the LCD-3 which became even more apparent after 15 minutes.
Low level detail and tone timbre was superb so that quiet orchestral passages were beautifully played.
Inner detail as well as tone edge detail was superb as were transient attacks - had something of an electrostatic (Stax) character..
Sound stage was open and most importantly each instrument was precisely localized in space in a 3-d imaging relative to other instruments. I hate a liquid sound where different instruments bleed at their tone edges to connect together and make a muddled sound stage. The Bada PH12 amp excels among many other amps in this regard.
Tone timbre was accurate and natural to the best degree I have heard on any headphone (including the top Stax model I had years ago but never used with my present amp and CDP).
Makes me wish I had gotten the LCD-4 though I still have doubts that the sound improvement is enough to justify the cost difference.
Bada PH12 amp (stock, not yet modified) and Eastsound E5 Platinum Reference Edition CD player.
I have stuck with my Sennheiser HD600 with Cardas cable for many years now, and recently bought the LCD-3.
I was afraid of buying the LCD-4 because of reports from some of difficulty to drive them and because I wasn't sure the extra cost was justified in terms of the degree of better sound.
The first thing I noticed was that the Bada PH12 amp had more than enough power to drive the LCD-3, and perhaps even do better power-wise than with the HD600. My first thought was that I should have gotten the LCD-4 which the Bada could have easily driven.
At first listen for a few minutes, the differences between the HD600 and LCD-3 seemed slight but after a few minutes I started to notice the quality improvement with the LCD-3 which became even more apparent after 15 minutes.
Low level detail and tone timbre was superb so that quiet orchestral passages were beautifully played.
Inner detail as well as tone edge detail was superb as were transient attacks - had something of an electrostatic (Stax) character..
Sound stage was open and most importantly each instrument was precisely localized in space in a 3-d imaging relative to other instruments. I hate a liquid sound where different instruments bleed at their tone edges to connect together and make a muddled sound stage. The Bada PH12 amp excels among many other amps in this regard.
Tone timbre was accurate and natural to the best degree I have heard on any headphone (including the top Stax model I had years ago but never used with my present amp and CDP).
Makes me wish I had gotten the LCD-4 though I still have doubts that the sound improvement is enough to justify the cost difference.