Anedio D2 DAC release
Dec 31, 2011 at 1:32 AM Post #46 of 1,416
That's the upgraded power supply, for the Modwright Oppo 95 with the tube mod. The do SS-only mods as well, more here:
 
http://www.modwright.com/modifications/oppo-95-truth-tube-mod.php
 
 
Jan 2, 2012 at 4:03 PM Post #47 of 1,416


Quote:
That's the upgraded power supply, for the Modwright Oppo 95 with the tube mod. The do SS-only mods as well, more here:
 
http://www.modwright.com/modifications/oppo-95-truth-tube-mod.php
 


The Modwright modifocations are based on the Oppo BDP-95 and the discontinued BDP-83/83SE. I emailed Modwright inquiring about the feasibility of modifying the BDP-93 and received the following response:
 
 
Hi John,
 
I am sorry, we do not perform mods on the Oppo BDP-93.  The circuitry of the Oppo 83SE and Oppo 95 are completly different from the Oppo 93, so it is not something that can be adjusted and used for the Oppo 93.
 
 
Thanks,
 
Kristin Boyd
Executive Director of Operations
ModWright Instruments, Inc.

www.modwright.com
360.247.6688

 
Consequently, anyone seeking to modify the Oppo BDP-95 must absorb the $1300 cost for the Blu-ray disk player plus the Modwright modifications costs.
 
 
Jan 2, 2012 at 4:45 PM Post #49 of 1,416


Quote:
This would be a 3rd option.
 
 
http://www.head-fi.org/t/555614/modwright-oppo-bdp-83-cdp-tube-mod


Yes, I am aware of the BDP-83 mods. However, that would necessitate buying a used BDP-83 or used modded BDP-83. I don't know if I would be excited about getting even a modded BDP-95 even if I was willing to spend that kind of money. I am much more of an audio lover at this point. It seems much more flexible and technically cleaner to get a high end DAC (e.g., the D2) and use it with a video|audio transport.
 
Jan 13, 2012 at 8:22 AM Post #51 of 1,416
Quote:
Updates posted on the Anedio website.


I only see a few new pictures, not specs, no design notes.
As with the D1, I somewhat find the case too tall, it always seemed to me that the D1 could have been a slimmer model and that half the case was empty.
 
 
 
Jan 13, 2012 at 9:20 AM Post #52 of 1,416


Quote:
I only see a few new pictures, not specs, no design notes.
As with the D1, I somewhat find the case too tall, it always seemed to me that the D1 could have been a slimmer model and that half the case was empty.
 
 


It is still being updated so check back later for the rest of the info.
 
You will get your wish as far as size - the D2 has similar width but is smaller in height and depth. I'm not sure exactly how much smaller, but James made it sound like a noteworthy reduction in size. 
 
 
Jan 13, 2012 at 12:43 PM Post #53 of 1,416


Quote:
Updates posted on the Anedio website.



Nice!, although we can stand to see the details. It's convenient for them to separate the D2 upgrade from the USB upgrade, so those who don't need the latter can keep that off the buying list.
 
EDIT: Okay, now that more details have been posted, the USB upgrade is included with the D2 and also  appears to be made available for previous D1 buyers. The D2 price is still a little less than that of the Lavry DA11.
 
It may be awhile before I get one, but it can easily be an audio solution for high end stereo or home video systems.
 
Jan 13, 2012 at 8:12 PM Post #55 of 1,416
The D2 vs. the Calyx would be a very interesting fight. Same XMOS USB chip, same drivers, same Sabre DAC, very similar features apart from the headphone amp, and the price is close enough not to matter.
 
Jan 13, 2012 at 9:18 PM Post #56 of 1,416
Spec comparison between the D1 and the D2: essentially the same.
 

D1 DAC Specifications

D/A Converter IC: ESS Technology ES9018 Sabre Reference 32-bit DAC
Sample Rates: 44.1K-192KHz
Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise: 0.0003% @ 1KHz, 0dBFS
0.0003% @ 20KHz, 0dBFS
Intermodulation Distortion: 0.00015% @ 19KHz + 20KHz 0 dBFS
2nd order IMD
Signal-to-Noise Ratio: 124 dB, 20-20KHz BW, 2 Vrms
126 dB, A-weighted, 2 Vrms
DAC Master Clock Jitter: 0.5 ps rms
Total Jitter at DAC Output: Read more . . .
Frequency Response: 20 Hz - 20 KHz (-0.15dB)
Phase: Non-inverting
Channel Separation: 130 dB @ 1KHz
120 dB @ 20KHz
Digital Inputs: USB, SPDIF 75-ohm BNC, SPDIF 75-ohm RCA, Toslink optical
Digital Input Resolution and Sample Rate: USB: 16 bits, 44.1K, 48KHz
SPDIF 75-ohm BNC: 24 bits, 44.1K, 48K, 88.2K, 96K, 176.4K, 192KHz
SPDIF 75-ohm RCA: 24 bits, 44.1K, 48K, 88.2K, 96K, 176.4K, 192KHz
Tosllink Optical: 24 bits, 44.1K, 48K, 88.2K, 96KHz
USB Operating System Requirement: Windows 7, Vista, XP. Apple Mac OS X
Digital Volume Control Steps: 0.5 dB
Volume Matching between Channels: Better than 0.1 dB
Line Output: Single-ended, RCA jacks with gold-plated contacts and Teflon dielectric
Line Output Level: 2.0 Vrms (unbalanced)
Line Output Impedance: 75 ohms
Line Output Offset: 5 mV max
Headphone Amp Current Output: 250 mA peak
Headphone Amp Output Impedance: 0.25 ohm, 20-20KHz
Headphone Amp THD+N: 0.0004%, 2Vrms into 60ohms
Headphone Jack: 1/4" TRS
Power Consumption: 8 W
Dimensions (W x H x D): 9.0 x 3.4 x 13.0 inches (229 x 86 x 330 mm)
Weight: 8 lbs (3.6 Kg)
 

D2 Specifications

D/A Converter IC: ESS Technology ES9018 Sabre Reference 32-bit DAC
Sample Rates: 44.1K-192KHz
Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise: 0.0003% @ 1KHz, 0dBFS
0.0003% @ 20KHz, 0dBFS
Intermodulation Distortion: 0.00015% @ 19KHz + 20KHz 0 dBFS
2nd order IMD
Signal-to-Noise Ratio: 123 dB, 20-20KHz BW, 2 Vrms (unbalanced)
125 dB, A-weighted, 2 Vrms (unbalanced)
126 dB, 20-20KHz BW, 4 Vrms (balanced)
128 dB, A-weighted, 4 Vrms (balanced)
DAC Master Clock Jitter: 0.5 ps rms
Total Jitter at DAC Output: Read more . . .
Frequency Response: 20 Hz - 20 KHz (-0.15dB)
Phase: Non-inverting
Channel Separation: 140 dB @ 1KHz
135 dB @ 20KHz
Digital Inputs: USB, SPDIF 75-ohm BNC, SPDIF 75-ohm RCA, Toslink optical
Digital Input Resolution and Sample Rate: USB: 24 bits, 44.1K, 48K, 88.2K, 96K, 176.4K, 192KHz
SPDIF 75-ohm BNC: 24 bits, 44.1K, 48K, 88.2K, 96K, 176.4K, 192KHz
SPDIF 75-ohm RCA: 24 bits, 44.1K, 48K, 88.2K, 96K, 176.4K, 192KHz
Tosllink Optical: 24 bits, 44.1K, 48K, 88.2K, 96KHz
Digital Volume Control Steps: 0.5 dB
Volume Matching between Channels: Better than 0.1 dB
Line Outputs: Unbalanced: RCA jacks with gold-plated contacts and Teflon dielectric
Balanced: Shielded Neutrik XLR connectors
Line Output Level: 2.0 Vrms (unbalanced)
4.0 Vrms (balanced)
Line Output Impedance: 75 ohms (unbalanced)
80 ohms (balanced)
Line Output Offset: 3 mV max
Headphone Amp Maximum Output Voltage: 4.0 Vrms (default)
5.3 Vrms (high-gain, set with internal jumpers)
Headphone Amp Maximum Output Power
(default setting):
530 mW into 30 ohms
260 mW into 62 ohms
53 mW into 300 ohms
How much power is enough?
Headphone Amp Maximum Output Power
(high-gain, set with internal jumpers):
830 mW into 30 ohms
460 mW into 62 ohms
95 mW into 300 ohms
Headphone Amp Current Output: 250 mA peak
Headphone Amp THD+N: 0.0004%, 4Vrms into 30ohms
Headphone Amp Intermodulation Distortion: 0.0002% @ 19KHz + 20KHz, 4Vrms into 30ohms
Headphone Amp Output Impedance: 0.035 ohm, 20-20KHz
Headphone Jack: 1/4" TRS, gold-plated
USB Streaming Mode: Asynchronous
USB Clocks: Two Independent Low-Jitter Master Clocks
USB Processor: XMOS 500 MHz real-time processor
USB Audio Operating System Requirement: Windows 7, Vista, XP
Apple Mac OS X
USB Audio Driver: Thesycon driver for Windows
No driver installation for Apple OS X
Galvanic Isolation: All digital inputs, using ultra high-speed transformers
Power Consumption: 7 W
Dimensions (W x H x D): 9.0 x 2.8 x 10.7 inches (230 x 71 x 272 mm)
Weight: 4.6 lbs (2.1 Kg)
 
 
Jan 13, 2012 at 9:41 PM Post #57 of 1,416
It would have been nice if they beefed up the head amp to full output of those National chips...
 
Jan 13, 2012 at 9:50 PM Post #58 of 1,416
Seriously considering this. I wonder how the DAC compares to others such as the likes of the Zodiac Gold and Invicta.
 
Jan 13, 2012 at 9:50 PM Post #59 of 1,416
Quote:
It would have been nice if they beefed up the head amp to full output of those National chips...

 
Is 5.3 Vrms not enough for you?
tongue_smile.gif

 
 
 
Jan 13, 2012 at 10:05 PM Post #60 of 1,416
Quote:
Is 5.3 Vrms not enough for you?


Nope.  Not after I turn the LFE channel up 15dB in my 5.1 to binaural DSP with my modded T50RPs.
 
I know that because 5.3VRMS just happens to be almost exactly what my O2 puts out right now.  It gets a bit louder than I need right now but my T50RPs are probably going to get even less efficient after I get around to trying more aggressive damping schemes so I could use a little more power.  When I build the ODA I'm going to make sure it gets the full 7VRMS.  I hope I can keep it within the O2's capabilities when combined with my movie EQ
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top