@pelopidas
Thank you!
But i was inspired by many more other brave people here, who've done much much more than me.
@ramachandra ,
@trodas and the incredible
@bichi (who has done intensive work on the Elite Pro), are just a few to mention.
The card mentioned at the start of this thread is one of the "Xtreme" models.
Mine is an "Elite Pro", this one here:
:
The first 2 rows of 47uF caps (from left to right) are in the signal path between the DACs and OpAmps --4 for each dac-opamp pair. (i replaced all 16 of these with SILMIC II)
The 3rd row, is for power supply to the analog side of the DACs (1x100uF + 1x47uF for each DAC). (haven't replaced those yet)
And the 2 lonely 220uF caps in the far-left, are for power supply to the opamps. (i replaced these 2 with SILMIC II)
The OPA1602, doesn't have dual power (V+/V- & GND), it only has V+ & GND (just like the card's original ones)
You said:
" If decoupling here means putting a capacitor in the signal path of the audio to block any DC.. then I would probably put SEPF there too."
You would actually put Panasonic SEPF (a polymer cap) on the audio signal path? Aren't those limited to a narrower frequency than the electrolytics?! I know solid polymer should be avoided in signal path (granted, the SEPF are Organic polyner.. but still)
The modifications i did, brought back the listening pleasure on this card, but kinda blurred some of the details. I don't think the Opamps are to blame, so that only leaves the silmics.
@bichi for example, ended up using SMD ceramic caps in place of the 16 caps that are in the signal path (from dac to opamp).
But for the moment, i was thinking of replacing the 2 silmics (that are powering the opamps), with some Panasonic FMs. And if they sound good and restore some detail, maybe do the same with the 3rd row of caps that are powering the DACs.
Now i know you said the silmic II are good for powering analog parts, but to me (and some others) it feels that they rob some detail.
Also:
"What I like about the Silmics is that they provide great separation of the instruments and, in my opinion, the blackest background. I am only talking a capacitor from + to - on the opamp. It serves as a small reservoir that is sufficient for the opamp to reach its dynamic potential."
For me , believe it or not, putting a 10uF silmicII + the 0.15uF wima on the power pins of the opamp, did the
exact opposite
It DID bring in
some bass (which felt a bit dodgy at times), but certainly wasn't worth loosing even more details. So i left only the 0.15uF wima.. which seems to do a good job of restoring some details and acoustics (and i can almost swear that it helped with the bass too.. feels more involved, more rounded and not all over the place)
Maybe the two 220uF silmics that are already on the board (for all 4 opamps), do a sufficient job.. Maybe putting more of them is just going overboard.. i don't know..
Regarding burn-in.. Since i replaced all the caps previously mentioned, they've been run for @ 40 hours.. and tbh, i don't sense any real difference.. (except for maybe some bass improvement)
The 10uF one has only been run for about 20hours
---
later edit:
I also want to recap my PIONEER VSX-D557 amplifier.. and i was thinking to use ELNAs.. but now i'm kind of skeptic..
Dunno what to use.. Maybe wait for a true 100+ hours of burn-in and see how they turn out..