TyTB
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2012
- Posts
- 140
- Likes
- 37
Hello everyone,
In my quest to find a better pair of headphones, I started experimenting with some basic, crappy, pre-set, software-based EQ on my phone.
I noticed, of course, that beyond a certain amount of boost, the sound just falls apart into a muddied, distorted mess.
At the time, I was playing around with some Sennheiser HD800s in a store, and was applying a bass-boost preset to see if I could get the HD800s to sound like a pair of Hifiman Arya Organics. To my delight, I was. With a simple bass boost, they ended up sounding identical.
Then I tried the same with the very U-shaped Meze 109 Pros, and once again, with a U-shaped EQ preset, I was able to get the HD800s to sound the same.
However, one thing I never tried was the inverse -- taking a U-shaped headphone like the Meze 109 Pro, and making it flat, by DECREASING the treble and bass.
This got me wondering -- I know that you can't endlessly boost a given frequency in EQ without destroying the sound, but what about the inverse? Can you endlessly DECREASE the frequency in EQ? Or do you still somehow get a distortion if you drop a given frequency too much?
Any help is appreciated.
I'm asking this because I'm basically just trying to decide between the HD800s and the Meze 109 Pros at this point. I was able to get the HD800s to sound like the Meze by boosting bass+treble in the HD800s, but I foolishly forgot to try and make the Meze's sound like the HD800s by dropping bass+treble in the Meze. If I am in fact able to, then it seems like they're every bit as good, while being substantially cheaper. The question then becomes why bother getting the HD800s?
Thanks!
Oh, and bonus question -- I've been told that hardware-based EQ is drastically superior to software-based EQ. Is there any substance to this claim? Would just adding something like a Lokius EQ to an audio stack be sufficient?
In my quest to find a better pair of headphones, I started experimenting with some basic, crappy, pre-set, software-based EQ on my phone.
I noticed, of course, that beyond a certain amount of boost, the sound just falls apart into a muddied, distorted mess.
At the time, I was playing around with some Sennheiser HD800s in a store, and was applying a bass-boost preset to see if I could get the HD800s to sound like a pair of Hifiman Arya Organics. To my delight, I was. With a simple bass boost, they ended up sounding identical.
Then I tried the same with the very U-shaped Meze 109 Pros, and once again, with a U-shaped EQ preset, I was able to get the HD800s to sound the same.
However, one thing I never tried was the inverse -- taking a U-shaped headphone like the Meze 109 Pro, and making it flat, by DECREASING the treble and bass.
This got me wondering -- I know that you can't endlessly boost a given frequency in EQ without destroying the sound, but what about the inverse? Can you endlessly DECREASE the frequency in EQ? Or do you still somehow get a distortion if you drop a given frequency too much?
Any help is appreciated.
I'm asking this because I'm basically just trying to decide between the HD800s and the Meze 109 Pros at this point. I was able to get the HD800s to sound like the Meze by boosting bass+treble in the HD800s, but I foolishly forgot to try and make the Meze's sound like the HD800s by dropping bass+treble in the Meze. If I am in fact able to, then it seems like they're every bit as good, while being substantially cheaper. The question then becomes why bother getting the HD800s?
Thanks!
Oh, and bonus question -- I've been told that hardware-based EQ is drastically superior to software-based EQ. Is there any substance to this claim? Would just adding something like a Lokius EQ to an audio stack be sufficient?