customcoco
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2011
- Posts
- 1,682
- Likes
- 86
Would Australasia or Oceania better meet your approval?
No. They did include Asia in the iem tour, so maybe it's a logistical issue...I'm sure they have their reasons. Just sour grapes on my part.
Don't worry - I felt the same way last time with their flagship IEM (when I missed out). I guess the great thing is that Beyer are giving plenty of people a chance to try their products.
The only issue I have with the way they are picking testers is that the vast majority continue to have nil or 1-2 reviews under their belts. There is a huge difference (IMHO) between reviewers with practical experience and someone just starting out. Of the 10 just picked - only myself and shotgunshane have a lot of reviews under our belts.
I did find with the DX160ie reviews that the two best by a country mile were ClieOS and Greq. And that is no disrespect meant to the other reviewers either - all who did a pretty good job. It's just that I know what I was like as a green reviewer when I first started - and for someone genuinely interested in researching a new product - it's nice to have a few comparative reviews from people with some reviewing experience. I look back on my own early reviews - and I made a lot of very noob mistakes. I'd like to think that a lot of my later ones are much more informative now. A typical review for me will often involve serious listening and note-taking over 2-3 weeks (depending on how long you have to trial the gear), and often 5-6 hours actually writing it up. When I first started - I'd write an impression after only a few days, and reviews comparing products were done with little to no experience with other gear, and no practical knowledge of doing things properly (eg volume matching etc).
I'll possibly get shot down re the above comments - but it's how I genuinely feel. A nice mix (IMO) would involve at least half of the reviews being from people with previous reviewing experience. I guess another yardstick for me is that if someone is genuinely interested in contributing reviews to help the community - they at least should start by reviewing their own existing gear. It's how I started
Anyway doublea71 - hang in there. If Beyer continue the excellent trend of involving the community, I'm sure you'll get your chance on some other gear. I really enjoyed your X5 review - so I'll look forward to it when it happens.
Looks like this time around I'm a bridesmaid and not the bride
......
..........
...............
Oh man, I can't believe I just typed that out ?!?!?!?!?!?!
To all the testers, congrats and I look forward to reading your final reviews.
Don't worry - I felt the same way last time with their flagship IEM (when I missed out). I guess the great thing is that Beyer are giving plenty of people a chance to try their products.
The only issue I have with the way they are picking testers is that the vast majority continue to have nil or 1-2 reviews under their belts. There is a huge difference (IMHO) between reviewers with practical experience and someone just starting out. Of the 10 just picked - only myself and shotgunshane have a lot of reviews under our belts.
I did find with the DX160ie reviews that the two best by a country mile were ClieOS and Greq. And that is no disrespect meant to the other reviewers either - all who did a pretty good job. It's just that I know what I was like as a green reviewer when I first started - and for someone genuinely interested in researching a new product - it's nice to have a few comparative reviews from people with some reviewing experience. I look back on my own early reviews - and I made a lot of very noob mistakes. I'd like to think that a lot of my later ones are much more informative now. A typical review for me will often involve serious listening and note-taking over 2-3 weeks (depending on how long you have to trial the gear), and often 5-6 hours actually writing it up. When I first started - I'd write an impression after only a few days, and reviews comparing products were done with little to no experience with other gear, and no practical knowledge of doing things properly (eg volume matching etc).
I'll possibly get shot down re the above comments - but it's how I genuinely feel. A nice mix (IMO) would involve at least half of the reviews being from people with previous reviewing experience. I guess another yardstick for me is that if someone is genuinely interested in contributing reviews to help the community - they at least should start by reviewing their own existing gear. It's how I started
Anyway doublea71 - hang in there. If Beyer continue the excellent trend of involving the community, I'm sure you'll get your chance on some other gear. I really enjoyed your X5 review - so I'll look forward to it when it happens.
Thanks for the opportunity! I am very excited and honored.
Just because we don't have Head-fi reviews doesn't mean we don't have a body of work or something to offer.
Just because we don't have Head-fi reviews doesn't mean we don't have a body of work or something to offer.