Latest Thread Images

1715108628706.png
IMG_8289.jpeg
E5A86C09-3D80-41E7-B11D-F6FD26D1601B.jpeg
1707684132954.jpeg
1707684157937.jpeg
PXL_20240206_205427233.NIGHT.jpg
IMG_2144.JPG L1.jpg PXL_20240127_091823117.jpg PXL_20240127_091812218.jpg PXL_20240127_091800505.jpg IMG_3089.jpeg Audeze-Frequenzmessungen.jpg 1706265651318.png 1706265705284.png 20240125_195510.jpg 1705446792220.png 1705446763081.png 1705446776591.png 1705381596767.png
See full thread gallery...
Audeze LCD-4
May 16, 2016 at 3:23 PM Post #3,781 of 11,995
It does appear the original cable is defective in some way because I did buy another XLR cable and hooked it up and it too is louder than the original so I do have to assume somehow the original has some issue...the funny thing is if i had not have decided to try a different cable i just would have continued to use the original with the volume turned up 5 or 6 clicks.....live and learn
 
May 16, 2016 at 7:45 PM Post #3,783 of 11,995
I concur and am thoroughly enjoying my LCD-4s....
 
May 16, 2016 at 7:47 PM Post #3,784 of 11,995
Yep my 200ohm is something special.
 
May 16, 2016 at 10:55 PM Post #3,786 of 11,995
May 17, 2016 at 5:09 AM Post #3,787 of 11,995
hifi59 said:
I think Audeze is breathing a sigh of relief seeing that this thread has slowed to a snails pace. This seems indicative that we are all enjoying the 4s without further issues.
Click to expand...


Hello,
I'm thinking that the LCD4 was subjected to a difficult launch because of a price doubled compared to the LCD-3 which brought a lot of disappointment among Audeze fans AND a negative review from Innerfidelity because of a 'lack' of trebles.
 
Looking at those two points, I would compare to the ABYSS same epic launch (price and Innerfidelity)  and say that the LCD4 will be a success !!
 
May 17, 2016 at 1:56 PM Post #3,788 of 11,995
draytonklammer said:
That's one fix I can put my support behind.
Click to expand...


Can you comment on the sound difference with the 200ohm version? My original (100Ohm) version failed unexpectedly (both drivers completely dead) and sent them in for service. Audeze called this morning to let me know that they will ship out today. Just wondering what others have found with the 200ohm version.
 
Thanks!
 
May 17, 2016 at 2:34 PM Post #3,789 of 11,995
I haven't actually tried the 100ohm version, but the 200 will be harder to drive and I've heard sounds slightly better.
 
May 17, 2016 at 4:15 PM Post #3,790 of 11,995
the 200 is a beast to drive...not that you cant drive it with lessor amps but in order to take advantage of a 4K HD i strongly recommend ample power
 
May 18, 2016 at 3:47 AM Post #3,793 of 11,995
jlbrach said:
the 200 is a beast to drive...not that you cant drive it with lessor amps but in order to take advantage of a 4K HD i strongly recommend ample power
Click to expand...


Does it have noticeably more resolution of detail than the LCD 1080p hd?
Is it true that Audeze has an upcoming OLED prototype?
Lol. Sorry, couldn't resist.
 
May 18, 2016 at 7:53 AM Post #3,795 of 11,995
After 2 months living with both the 200ohm and 100ohm. Bad news for the current 200ohm owners, the 200 ohm is not even close on the level of the old 100ohm model, 100ohm hits harder n deeper. clearer, less grainy, more forward n textured, fuller midrange(less 5k to 8k dip). better extended n sweeter hi s. On the soundstage presentation is the same story, the 100ohm seems to have alot better focus on the centre image while at the same time being more concise on the imaging. The 200 ohm is no Slouch, but really, I wouldnt wanna hear the 200ohm again after hearing the 100ohm.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)
Back
Top